You're welcome.--S. Rich (talk) 02:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

In response to your feedback edit

I think you are wrong - pages are rarely locked (protected).

Ruslik_Zero 14:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Proposed deletion of White Anglo-Saxon Catholic edit

 

The article White Anglo-Saxon Catholic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence for notability of this term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 14:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Warren National University edit

Hi. I'd suggest you add your "vote" to the "Survey" subsection, or your comments in the RfC might end up getting ignored. This is typically done in this sort of format:

  • Oppose. I strongly oppose this using a pejorative term like "Diploma Mill" in the opening paragraph to describe Kennedy Western University/Warren National University because...

Just be sure to keep your survey explanation very short, preferably no more than a few sentences. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

I believe another editor already did it for me. I wish you well. Sunshine Warrior04 (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
OK
  • You seem to have extensive personal knowledge of the history of WNU/KWU. How do you know so much? E.g. what's the basis for you writing, "She also made a misleading statement that she passed 40% of her classwork in 16 hours. In fact she only took one course but got some credit from the University?" --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 13:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
I had investigated this for some time mostly for my work. This is, of course this is a very old topic and one that is moot since the University is now closed. I did a little research as to why the University closed its doors. Mostly it had to do with the GAO investigation. This investigation is usually what is cited when people talk about why the University is substandard. It was stated by Claudia Glazer (I may have mispelled) who said that she only took one course, that of Hazardous Waste and passed the course within 16 hours. I spoke to students of the school and none of them could do such a feat in so little time. To be honest, I did attend two accredited colleges and took courses which were ridiculously easy like that. But she had judged the entire institution based on one course. She said that she earned 40% of her credit that way. Logic would dictate that she may have received credit for previous work, something that KWU did offer to some students. Otherwise to say one course would be 40% of the credit required for graduation would be preposterous. No student I spoke with had any similar experience. So really this statement is misleading.
And I will repeat myself. No student or faculty member was allowed to give testimony. In short the GAO investigation was a sham. I really could not care less about the administrators who quite honestly are a bunch of putzes since they will not even release transcripts for former students. But I do care about the students. They are the real victims here. I wish you well. Sunshine Warrior04 (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, that's helpful. Please explain the nature of your work and why you were investigating this matter. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Not sure why its important to you but I am an Engineer with a major electronics company. I was looking for a school which granted online degrees in Electrical Engineering. Mostly it was for my own curiosity. At the time Kennedy Western was the only such school. Today there are many others. I am currently pursuing a Masters at an accredited University. Sunshine Warrior04 (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I'm confused. You said you investigated WNU for your work, not for your curiosity. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
The reason I'm pressing this issue is because Wikipedia's terms of service have changed since you joined, such that now you're required to disclose any paid contributions you make. If you have an unpaid conflict-of-interest, for instance if you were a KWU student and wanted to preserve the legitimacy of your degree, then you're strongly encouraged to avoid editing the article directly, though disclosure wouldn't be an absolutely requirement. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 00:13, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
I can assure you that I did not make any paid contributions. Nor do I have any conflict of interest. My only agenda is the truth. Now let me ask you something. What is your involvement with Kennedy-Western/Warren National? It seems you really have an interest in editing this article. Why is it? Sunshine Warrior04 (talk) 01:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
No involvement at all. I have a broad personal interest in unaccredited universities and have edited a number of their pages over the years. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 16:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Sunshine Warrior04. You have new messages at Clarkcj12's talk page.
Message added 04:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Clarkcj12 (talk) 04:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Just letting you know the article has been moved to the correct page. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Sunshine Warrior04 (talk) 05:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply