User talk:SunDawn/Archives/2022/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please Help me to comment and fix this Bio page Laksmi De-Neefe Suardana and comment on Talk:Laksmi De-Neefe Suardana
There has apparently been long-term massive deletion and content removals made by User:HiChrisBoyleHere on Laksmi De-Neefe Suardana page. Please stop his disruptive edits by deleting major references and replace it with Instagram links as a reliable reference, as he did on [1], [2], [3], [4] and more on article page history. He kept on rejecting himself to read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons guidelines before started adding Instagram links as the main source of references. That is why I have to escalate this Issue, please help me to fix the page. Thanks before...--Canny Yeohmanly (talk) 08:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.
Technical news
- Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
- The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.
Arbitration
- Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
- An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.
Hello, SunDawn
If I make edits without sources, it's not that it's not true, just that I couldn't pick which source to use-Mrman19 — Preceding undated comment added 14:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Mrman19! Every material in the Wikipedia should be sourced. You can use any source you like, providing the source is reliable and verifiable, per WP:RS. Thank you! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello!
I've been following Special:AbuseLog for the past few hours (time flies) and wanted to thank you for keeping Wikipedia great! - Cosmic (talk) 04:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the encouragement! I need that! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
FFXI edit
Hi, I don't understand why my edit was reverted back. "Illusions of Adoulin" accurately fits the naming scheme. ZepZepM (talk) 05:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies, it seems that I am mistaken in the revert. I will undo the revert and remove the warning on your talk page, thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Reply: List of colonial buildings in Santo Domingo article
- @SunDawn: Thanks for the comment bro ;D Im happy a lot that you like it. and pretty good Sun Dawn for prettier future but also a great Latin America too, we accord. but you not visited Latin America yet that a shame its extremely beautiful :) Greek Sun Dawn, pretty BrugesFR (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
"Blancos" and latinos down from Rio Grande to botton are extremely fraternal believe me, just an example see the million of best latina girls with her pale couples is just extraordinary here--BrugesFR (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
So dont hate us--BrugesFR (talk) 05:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- No, I don't hate Latin America at all, I just don't find opportunity to go there. I am sure you got nice places and people right there! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
78.186.97.79
..............Hello SunDawn We are following you so You should or must be careful.(of course it is joke.)(It is how you understand it.)...........
- Hello to you as well! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Answer fro 154.5.231.254 user
- I did not see captcha image-text to reply on the page where I found your message, so I am trying to offer more information here on Mr. Jack Rayner good run - personal best:
- Hi,
- I have watched the Rome - Diamond League, from June 09, 2022 (few days ago), on youtube, the men 5,000m race and Mr. Rayner was the 2nd Pacer, did a great job:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBmS364zmbc
- He stops at 3,000m - see the race in the link, at the min 6.09
- At 6.09 of the video, he is slowing just before crossing the line and we see 7:41.50 the time of Kejelcha (he continues to run with higher speed!) and is 2 metres ahead.
- This time means 6.5 m/sec speed and we can estimate 0.6 sec in addition to the time of Kejelcha; it makes the stopping/finishing time of Mr. Rayner at about 7:42.10.
- Is the best time of him if you're looking in the public records, I believe I am not wrong...
- He looked so healthy, confident and in control... to me was the first time to watch him and I was impressed!
- Could have been much better, faster - for sure! if Mr. Rayner had to compete in a 3000m race, in my opinion near 7:30.00
- (I was a 400m and 800m runner decades ago, ... "local glory", far from the international level but I still love to watch the competitions!)
- PS: I see it here!!! 154.5.231.254 (talk) 08:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
My reverted edits
Hi, you seem to have reverted a couple of edits on a page. I want to say that I think you are correct and I have corrected grammar issues. Even though a lot of the article doesn't have sources I guess it is okay since the last section did have like 7 sources. Have a nice day Bigeshjen (talk) 11:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Bigeshjen
My MGA Entertainment redirect
Someone told me that you like my new redirect to MGA Entertainment. Thank you for enjoying it. I love redirects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chidie345 (talk • contribs) 06:54, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
"Unaccredited" schools in Switzerland / diploma mills
Hello SunDawn, I have been notified of a new article List of unaccredited higher education institutions in Switzerland by ErrgoProxy that very much ressembles interactions you seem to have had recently - albeit under another username (cf semantic closeness on this declined article). Inputs would be welcome. Best regards PierreLsn (talk) 21:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Quick follow up, after spending quite a bit of time seeing if this was going somewhere, I ventured in believing a deletion might be the best way to go. Again, your input much appreciate. PierreLsn (talk) 00:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| I've noticed that, after reviewing a new article, you often send a message to the article creator thanking them for the article. This is a really nice touch, especially for newer editors. I got a note from a reviewer once when I began writing articles, and I still remember how great it made me feel.
Thank you for taking that extra step to show appreciation. Schazjmd (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much for the barnstar! Your message really motivated me to do more! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
How can I add Source
How can I add source. 2007absullah (talk) 14:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! You can read them in WP:CITE for more details. What device are you using to edit? I can also help you add source if you like. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022
Hello SunDawn/Archives/2022,
- Backlog status
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
- Backlog drive
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. 
Barnstars will be awarded.
- TIP – New school articles
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
- Misc
There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 9921 articles, as of 08:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
- Notes
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
karolina bielawska
please do not remove karolina Zakrzewska bielawska because her real full name is correct and i am dictator like president ferdinand marcos sr. thanks. 61.9.103.59 (talk) 13:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello 61.9.103.59 if you don't want it to be removed you must provide sources. Are you threatening me? Thanks and have a good night. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 June 2022
- News and notes: WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
- In the media: Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
- Special report: "Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"?
- Featured content: Articles on Scots' clash, Yank's tux, Austrian's action flick deemed brilliant prose
- Recent research: Wikipedia versus academia (again), tables' "immortality" probed
- Serendipity: Was she really a Swiss lesbian automobile racer?
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Enterprise signs first deals
- Gallery: Celebration of summer, winter
Nathu La Cho La Conflict
65 killed in the Nathu La incident for India
32 killed in the Nathu La incident for China
More Indian soldiers died, so it is a stalemate 燦鴻 (talk) 12:54, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- The footnotes on Nathu La and Cho La clashes clearly stated that it is Indian victory, or that Indians gained tactical advantages, and that Indian troops beat back Chinese troops. The sources clearly didn't state that is a Chinese victory. Victories in wars are not defined on how many deaths on both sides, but more likely defined on tactical or strategic considerations. Please do not change this matter without any references. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)