Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Sudhirn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gary King (talk) 17:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Sudhir Neerattupuram edit

 

I have nominated Sudhir Neerattupuram, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhir Neerattupuram. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Victor Lopes (talk) 23:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Thalavady edit

 

A tag has been placed on Thalavady requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Hitrohit2001 (talk) 06:23, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Janmabhumi edit

I have Wikified the article that you have created but it could probably do with further work. Paste (talk) 16:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Redirect of Hindutva Parties edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hindutva Parties, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hindutva Parties is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hindutva Parties, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

NSS Hindu College edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of NSS Hindu College, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.nsshinducollege.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Sudhir Neerattupuram edit

 

A tag has been placed on Sudhir Neerattupuram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Aktsu (t / c) 07:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please remove the speedy deletion tag from the page of Sudhir Neerattupuram Sudhirn (talk) 04:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Sudhir Neerattupuram edit

 

I have nominated Sudhir Neerattupuram, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhir Neerattupuram (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Tinu Cherian - 06:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Sudhir Neerattupuram edit

 

A tag has been placed on Sudhir Neerattupuram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Sudhir Neerattupuram, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Balasaheb deoras.jpeg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Balasaheb deoras.jpeg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 07:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Balasaheb deoras.jpeg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Balasaheb deoras.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 07:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sabari balasram edit

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

 

The article Sabari balasram has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Children and Young Adult's literature Newsletter - October 2010 edit

  Newsletter October 2010

Project news
Unreferenced BLPs

There's only a few Unreferenced BLPs (Biographies of living people) left. Why not head over to the page and help by adding sources to the articles? It's an important job, that requires assistance.


From the Editor

Hello and welcome to this, the second edition of the newsletter. This month, I need to ask a favour of you. You may have seen that this month I had to write the newsletter by my self. I really need your help with writing and giving suggestions. If you have a suggestion for a future edition, please list it at the tips desk. You may also notice the links underneath this piece. Please use them to share this newsletter on your favourite social networks. Until next time, happy editing!


Share:  Twitter · Identica · Facebook · Delicious · Reddit · Digg · Buzz · StumbleUpon
Ways to promote the project
If you're interested in promoting the project, why not visit the Outreach department for more ideas?

There are many ways to promote the project. One of them is to add the project's ad to your userpage. To do this, simply add the code {{Template:Wikipedia ads|ad=212}} to your talk or user page. Another thing you can do is to invite other users to join the project. To find prospective members search the history pages of Children's literature-related articles and invite people who seem to be deoing good things for these articles. The code for the invitation template is {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature/Invite}}.

Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? - It's all here



Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Children's literature at 00:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC).Reply

Nomination of Janmabhumi for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janmabhumi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janmabhumi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kutyava (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


Dear Sir,

I don't understand that why you are trying to delete the 43 years old nationalistic newspaper in Kerala, India...??!! There is various views are adapted the various newspapers. There is vide opposing elements In India against the nationalist views. i.e. Janmabhumi occured. The leftists, Indian National Congress persons, Islamic Jihadies, Christian fundamentalists etc are trying to supress the Indian way of thinking and news expressions. Janmabhumi daily expressing the Indian nationalistic views. The anti-national elements are trying to anyway to block this views. They are using ugly ways for this. Janmabhumi daily is related to the India ruling party Sri. Narendra Modi's BJP & RSS. Don't delete the page on the utter political enemy mind. The content in the Janmabhumi page didn't against any wikipedian Terms. If you delete this page, I suggest you to delete all other newspaper pages of Desabhimani, Madhyamam, Malayala Manorama, Matrubhumi, Janayugam etc. from wikipedia. If you only delete the page of Janmabhuni, I am complained to the Central Govt of India against wikipedia's injustice act against Janmabhumi Daily. I also complained to the Modi Govt to ban wikipedia in India also. Janmabhumi is publishing by India Govt's licence.

I humbly request you to don't delete the wikipedia page of the reputed, established, credible newspaper.

Waiting for your positive reply and action.

Thanks & Regards,

Sudhir Neerattupuram ID: sudhirn Sudhirn (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Sudhirn: Sudhir Ji Don't give him any more respect. He's playing dirty politics here. challu chekkan -- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  11:30, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are playing dirty politics..... Janmabhumi is a respected daily in Kerala Sudhirn (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sudhirn edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sudhirn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Don't delete the page Sudhirn (talk) 12:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Don't delete the page of Janmabhumi.... I didn't request you to delete this page... Janmabhumi daily is a credible, reputed, national newspaper in Kerala, India. They have more than 5 lakhs readers around the world. So ugly poitical players / rivals of Janmabhumi are trying to delete this page with false statements. If there is any unethical or against wikipedia's policies and guidelines remove such matters. Only improving editings will do. The deletion is not a good thing. Sudhirn (talk) 04:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sudhirn edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Sudhirn, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://neeratt.blogspot.com/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Sudhirn (talk) 17:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sudhirn edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Sudhirn, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sudhirn (talk) 17:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear Sir,

I humbly requested you to didn't delete the page, I'm edit it and remove the unwanted URLs. If there is any controversial matters in it, please remove/edit it as per Wikipedia's guidelines/criteria. I am inserted the Blogs IDs for the reference purposes. If it is unacceptable, remove it. All other things given in the page is true and credible.

Remove thee speedy deletion tag from this page as early as possible.

Thanks,

Sudhirn

You've got mail edit

 
Hello, Sudhirn. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  09:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sudhirn edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sudhirn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022 edit

  Your edit to Keto diet has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Halki Diabetes edit

 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Halki Diabetes has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.topworldmarket.com/2020/02/what-is-halki-diabetes-remedy-does-it.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. DanCherek (talk) 12:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DanCherek (talk) 12:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhirn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There is no ant copyright infringement in the given article of Halki Diabetes. The given article is from https://www.topworldmarket.com/2020/02/what-is-halki-diabetes-remedy-does-it.html is written by me. This website is created by me and the said article is written & published by me. I am the owner of the said article, the copyright is belongs to me, therefor no violations of any copyright rules by me. So please accept the article and remove the block at the earliest. Sudhirn (talk) 19:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked for copyright violations, but for spam. You are looking to add your spam to Wikipedia, and this is not the place for it. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhirn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

In your Speedy deletion of Draft: Halki Diabetes[edit] note states that. “The page Draft: Halki Diabetes has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.topworldmarket.com/2020/02/what-is-halki-diabetes-remedy-does-it.html“ So I am clarify about its copyright matters. I am including the reference links for more clarifications on the related subjects I don’t know that it is a violation of your rules and spamming. In future I am trying to my best to avoid such mistakes. So I humbly request you to given me a chance and unblock my account at the earliest. Thank you Sudhirn (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Why are you bringing up your copyright violations? You've already been told this isn't why you were blocked. WP:IDHT. Yamla (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhirn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason informed me by RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC) told that “You weren't blocked for copyright violations, but for spam.”. I replied it to him that about spamming is “I am including the reference links for more clarifications on the related subjects I don’t know that it is a violation of your rules and spamming. In future I am trying to my best to avoid such mistakes. So I humbly request you to given me a chance and unblock my account at the earliest. Thank you “Sudhirn (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC) When I am searching the term Halki Diabetes in Wikipedia for more details for writing a article about it. But Wikipediat inform me that “The page "Halki diabetes" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review “. So I am creating a page for Halki Diabetes. I am a writer and published so much articles about Health related subjects in various websites. I am only inserted the few paragraphs and given only 1 link for more details for reference and publish for more adding by other wikipedians. I don’t know that if a new page creating is a spamming. Now I am decided to don’t add any information in Wikipedia. If you accept my views, remove my block at the earliest. Thank you. Sudhirn (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You seem still not to understand why your account is blocked. You copied promotional material from a promotional website here, and tried to use it to create an article. It was not informative, it was advertising; we call that spam. Since you seem not to know the difference between informative writing and promotional writing, I am declining your unblock request. Girth Summit (blether) 16:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhirn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you consider my article as promotional writing & not a informative writing, I will accept it and promise you that in future I didn't including the promotional writings in wikipedia. Please review my case and unblock my account at the earliest. Thanks... Sudhirn (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You might accept it, but if you don't understand it, you will just do it again in the future. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhirn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Using Wikipedia for spam purposes. I received a message saying that "This account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia." I understand my mistake and humbly request you to unblock my account at the earliest. I promise that in future I didn't do this type mistakes. Thanks

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.