No need to userfy -- this was the entire content of Datawatch:

Datawatch is a company which makes computer software designed to assist in helpdesk or other call logging environments. Famously known for the Visual QSM service portal and the new Visual|HD system which works very smilar to Visual QSM but in a web based environment.

NawlinWiki 11:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

       yeah Dflav1138 16:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


DYK edit

  On 28 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Security Log, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--M.K. 12:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Localsecuritysettings.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Localsecuritysettings.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Legality of the Vietnam War edit

A tag has been placed on Legality of the Vietnam War, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Michael Johnson (talk) 23:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry you are disappointed by the removal of your article. I nominated it for speedy deletion, but did not delete it. That was done by an admin who reviewed my nomination and accepted its validity. --Michael Johnson (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
The content that you added to the page was

The page received no revisions other than tagging for deletion. GRBerry (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia edit

Please see WP:NOT. Your recent contributions indicate that you do not understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a site for technical support or original research. Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 20:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eventproperties.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Eventproperties.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Yakyuken Special edit

 

The article The Yakyuken Special has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not establish its notability by providing significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. In fact, this article does not provide a single source. Fleet Command (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fleet Command (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply