Statto74
Recent edits edit
Please bear in mind that some of your edits, such as those to Chris Waddle and Glenn Hoddle are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Please refrain from adding them. SteveO 12:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Glenn Hoddle edit
Do you have a source for Jasper Carrott saying that? If he did then please accept my apologies, although I think my reversion of your edit to Chris Waddle still stands... SteveO 13:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nope. I rarely have anything to do with the article, but that quote has been there for ages. I'll try and dig up a source for it.
- Out of interest, judging from your user page and your edits, you may also fancy joining Wikiproject Only Fools and Horses. The project is in its infancy, and I don't know if it'll last, but any help would be appreciated. SteveO 15:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've just done the same and it does appear that Carrott said it. I believe I may owe you a humble apology!
- PS. Remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Just type out four tildes (~~~~) after your message and your name and the date will automatically be produced. SteveO 15:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
No worries, I'll try to remember thatStatto74 15:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
FA Cup shock results edit
Please see my reply on the talk page and let us know your thoughts. Valenciano 12:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tony Scannell, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://entertainment.excite.co.uk/news/soaps/24384, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Tony Scannell. Then you should do one of the following:
- Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Tony Scannell where we can find that note; or
- Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tony Scannell.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! == ReyBrujo 15:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Removal of relevant facts instead of sourcing edit
Hi. I have re-instated the relevant facts you removed from Howard Webb recently. These merely needed expanding on to make their relevancy more obvious. I have retained your point about the "three red cards", as this is useful to the article. Thanks. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 12:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Copyright issue with Select Group Referees 2006/07 edit
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Select Group Referees 2006/07, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thefa.com/GrassrootsNew/Referee/NewsAndFeatures/Postings/2002/06/TheSelectGroup. As a copyright violation, Select Group Referees 2006/07 appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Select Group Referees 2006/07 has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Select Group Referees 2006/07 and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Select Group Referees 2006/07 with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Select Group Referees 2006/07.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 12:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Select Group Referees 2006/07. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- lucasbfr talk 22:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I made some edits to Erika Hoffman to fix its worst problems, but it still needs work. For a bio of a living person (WP:BLP), you need better sources and references than you originally provided. Jmozena (talk) 20:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Do you possibly share your computer with somebody else who may have created this page? According to the history page, you're the original author. Jmozena (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Matches played in by Craig Johnston, which I constantly need to amend the flag to ENG from AUS or RSA as some users don't understand he counts as ENG after playing for the England U21's
Own Goals edit
- They are recorded in the specific games which they scored an own goal in. They shouldn't be added to a table which is for the scorers for that club. Look at Real Madrid's season article, it doesn't tell you, who scored those own-goals, is that positive or negative data? It's recording just own-goals, it's a poorly constructed table. Even that final totals column violates WP:ACCESS. I refuse to let any Tottenham article have such stupidly displayed information. Govvy (talk) 10:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
