Stang99gtv8
Response edit
I have reverted myself. I still do not feel that this is in line with our policies, but I also did not realize that your "response" section was commented out; I thought that was in the article itself. (It does not show the comment start and end marks in diffs, and I have my diffs set to not show the article beneath them.) That led to a much harsher response than was warranted, and I apologize. I reiterate (as have numerous other editors) that this does not belong in the article regarding the Ecma standard; it is an action undertaken exclusively by Microsoft, and we have a Criticism of Microsoft article already that I feel is a better fit. I again encourage you to discuss your edits on the talk page, but will not revert you again. —bbatsell ¿? 06:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)