Srimant ROSHAN
WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you edit
You're specially invited to join the WikiProject India's Collaboration of the month program.
The collaboration will help promote many articles to the good and featured article status, but to do so, we need your help! For further information, see the main page of the collaboration.
Sign up for this collaboration by listing your username under the participants section and regularly participating in the collaboration. If you have already signed, please ignore this message.
You can discuss this newsletter here.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.Sent by Hulged ⟨talk⟩ on behalf of WikiProject India. Thank you!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok I have to sign up in this Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 edit
Hello, I'm JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to Karla caves seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JimRenge (talk) 12:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
I personally visited the site of Karla Cave and captured this image. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
You can visit and test also. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 17:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
You have to clib the 10th piller and use mobile light to see that painting clearly because it is in darkness. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Political Pensioner edit
Hi! Why did you revert the change that was made in Colonial section of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_pensioner . There is no reference. It seems like primary research, not allowed on Wikipedia. I already gave an explanation why that whole text was deleted. Seomelono (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
No edit summary was there so I revert it
Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 05:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 15 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ikshvaku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nimi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sarvatata you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Sarvatata you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Sarvatata for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Attempted reversal of GA nomination closure edit
Srimant ROSHAN, your nomination of Sarvatata to be a Good Article was failed yesterday for a very good reason: the article not only does not meet the criteria for a GA by a wide margin, it is currently barely a Start-class article. (See Wikipedia:Content assessment for the various article class levels and what their quality should be.) The reviewer properly closed your nomination as unsuccessful, and it is inappropriate for you to renominate it at this point, especially given the very minor edits that you made in the past hour. I have restored the Talk:Sarvatata page to reflect that closure. Please do not try to renominate the article at this time; instead, familiarize yourself with the assessment levels and also check out actual Good Articles on similar topics to see what is needed for an article to qualify. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I am the reviewer who failed this article. Please see Talk:Sarvatata/GA1 for comments and a detailed review as to why it failed. Please note that if you renominate the article again without addressing any of these comments, it will be failed straight away. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 09:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarvatata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 09:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aja of Kosala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Sorry for this edit, I fixed the problem. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 11:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright edit
Hello Srimant ROSHAN! Your additions to Jambhul Aakhyan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hiroji Indulkar edit
The article Hiroji Indulkar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hiroji Indulkar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Can you explain why the article failed in the first and the third criteria? Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 10:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello - I'm not the reviewer, but according to the good article criteria, a good article should be well-written and broad in its coverage. Your article seems to be missing a lot about his life and his work. I recommend looking at similar GAs for reference. If you have more questions, feel free to ask in the Teahouse. Good luck! Spinixster (chat!) 01:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hiroji Indulkar edit
The article Hiroji Indulkar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hiroji Indulkar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hoary -- Hoary (talk) 06:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive edit
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Your GA nomination of Zombivli (2022 film) edit
The article Zombivli (2022 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zombivli (2022 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TompaDompa -- TompaDompa (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 edit
Hello, I'm Re Packer&Tracker. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Vikramaditya that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 17:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- I really sorry for mistake I have made but I want to report about certain Wikipedia users who vendalized the page with information which are not have reliable sources to confirm and they do just not for ones they have hundreds of such edits. But I don't know how to report about this vendalizers. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- You can report the vandals here WP:AIV and I do agree that the user is not here to build an encyclopedia and Doug blocked them yesterday. (link) But still edit summaries like this (link) are not acceptable. Cheers. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 04:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize for my mistake. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 06:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- You can report the vandals here WP:AIV and I do agree that the user is not here to build an encyclopedia and Doug blocked them yesterday. (link) But still edit summaries like this (link) are not acceptable. Cheers. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 04:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Do not remove discussion page sections once others have commented edit
Hi Srimant ROSHAN. Please do not remove discussion page sections once others have commented, like you did here. Please be advised that continuing to do so may result in loss of editing privileges -Fastily 08:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ok I understand but I want to end that discussion so what I have to do now. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 09:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 10 edit
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Nicakṣu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuru.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive edit
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |