ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਸ਼ੇਰ edit

 

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AnandpurSahibExhibition1.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:AnandpurSahibExhibition1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Punjabi sherji edit

Ki haal chaal veerji!(hello big brother how are you)

you seem pretty good at reverting, removing content. but this time you have a positive opportunity to use your skills. see user:90.196.3.244. He is a crazy vandal.[1] Please fix him if you can Thanks.

Sat sri Akal, (hello) bhull (mistake) chukk (minor mistake) maaf (Forgive) kari (do) veerey (brother)Ajjay (talk) 16:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

O yaar (friend) mainu (me) tang (harrassing) karda (doing) hai (does) and Sikh articles nu (to)vandalise (vandalism) karda hai (habit of doing)Ajjay (talk) 04:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks veer (brother)Ajjay (talk) 04:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you elaborate on your block of User:90.196.3.244. I see he was in an edit war with User:Ajjay but I am having problems following what has happened and why he was blocked. Thanks GtstrickyTalk or C 13:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Please don't add block templates [2] yourself, especially to talk pages of users who are not blocked. Only administrators can block users. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Warnings edit

March 2008 edit

  I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Ajjay in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 13:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:AnandpurSahibExhibition2.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:AnandpurSahibExhibition2.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Copyright problem: Nagar Kirtan edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Nagar Kirtan, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Nagar_kirtan, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Nagar Kirtan and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Nagar Kirtan with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Nagar Kirtan.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Nagar Kirtan saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

    • This article was tagged as a suspected copyright infringement on April 13th. Investigation confirms that it was previously published at that site before being published here. Since you were not notified, I am relisting the matter for seven matters to extend the investigation. I have looked for, but haven't found an explicit indication that this article is licensed under GFDL at that site. It has been for some time a GFDL violation even if it is, as there's no attribution. But the question of original license will need to be cleared up before this text can be used. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply