User talk:Soulbust/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

2019 archive.

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of National Football League annual punting yards leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Zombie Awareness Month for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zombie Awareness Month is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie Awareness Month until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 11:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stan Twitter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joel Klatt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gus Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of most-subscribed YouTube channels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-subscribed YouTube channels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-subscribed YouTube channels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Built Ford Tough Offensive Line of the Year) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Built Ford Tough Offensive Line of the Year.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for filling in an empty spot in the NFL Awards navbox. Much appreciated.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 07:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of most-subscribed YouTube channels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-subscribed YouTube channels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-subscribed YouTube channels (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 19:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Streamy Awards Series Winners Discontinued

Template:Streamy Awards Series Winners Discontinued has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Streamy Awards Actress Performance Winners

Template:Streamy Awards Actress Performance Winners has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Streamy Awards Actor Performance Winners

Template:Streamy Awards Actor Performance Winners has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaiden Animations (March 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Legacypac was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Deleted via discussion twice in the last year

Legacypac (talk) 06:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Soulbust! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 06:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

alphabetizing categories

Hey, Soulbust! I noticed you alphabetized the cats on Kelly Catlin -- is that something you have to do manually, or is there a tool? Thanks for any help! I tried to find info on various guidelines and help pages and just keep going around in circles. --valereee (talk) 14:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jaiden Animations

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jaiden Animations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Please don't move categories

Hello, Soulbust

Please do not move categories. It is not like renaming an article or project page. Individual articles/pages are assigned to categories and when you move a category, it doesn't move all of the assigned pages to the new category name. So, you end up with a new category that is empty and an old category, which is actually being used, with a redirect tag which shouldn't happen.

If you want to retitle a category, please propose it at Category speedy renames and then, if approved, a bot will reassign all of the articles to the new category name. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Liz, I was planning to manually go to the articles and edit the category to the new one, but thank you for suggesting the proposal/bot renaming process to me. I was not familiar with it. Thanks, Soulbust (talk) 04:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Dance Showdown judges has been nominated for discussion

Category:Dance Showdown judges, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 12:09, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cassie Cage Mortal Kombat X Render.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cassie Cage Mortal Kombat X Render.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belle Delphine (July 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Fails WP:SUSTAINED since most of her notability came from one or two "publicity stunts". Also per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belle Delphine, which was a fairly recent and definitive "delete" vote.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Eugenia Cooney

I think she is notable already, loads of reliable sources are available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.122.30.69 (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Piano Concerto (Clara Schumann)

Soulbust, the QPQ review you requested in your DYK review of this nomination has been provided. Please return when you can to continue your review. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Belle Delphine

Do you think the draft is now good enough to be moved to mainspace? Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 00:08, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belle Delphine (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belle Delphine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Belle Delphine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 23:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Belle Delphine has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Belle Delphine. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 09:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Overwatch animated media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overwatch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Overwatch animated media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Ferguson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

BLP warning

When a removal is noted as BLP, the material in question absolutely must not be reinstated without a clear and unambiguous consensus. Should you ever do so again, you will be blocked from editing. BLP is absolutely not optional, and "not the best source" means not to use it, especially in controversial situations. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:13, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

User:Seraphimblade,

You left out a part of my quote. I said Mashable "isn't the *best* source possible." And the context here is important. I meant it in a theoretical sort of way; the Mashable source is the best source available for the section it is citing. And it clearly passes any arbitrary threshold for usage as a source. Mashable has not been deemed non-credible (to my knowledge), nor has it been deemed inaccurate (again, to my knowledge). The source is relevant. And I can argue for its inclusion via WP:SOURCE. Additionally, your point of "especially in controversial situations" is a relatively weak point. That's because–relative to the rest of the Onision article–a YouTube peer criticizing his writings is fairly clearly at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to a "controversial situation". By the way, you have not detailed, in any way, why the Mashable source is "not a particularly good reference," as you described it in your original revert edit summary. What is your reasoning behind that? Can you better articulate why you believe Mashable isn't a suitable or "particularly good reference" for the article, and specifically, the section it was citing? Because, again, I can argue that it checks out via WP:SOURCE.

Additionally, I'd be remiss if I didn't bring up that your warning of a block comes with unclear instructions. In your edit summary, you state I'll be blocked if the source is reinstated "without better sourcing," but here on my talk page, you state that that block will happen if the source is reinstated "without a clear and unambiguous consensus." So which one is it? Do you want a different source? Or do you want the same source, but with support for its inclusion via a talk page discussion.

In short, I'll be starting a talk page discussion on the source, because you mentioned that the source being reinstated without a clear and unambiguous consensus would result in my block. So, with that in mind, I gather the source's reinstatement with that type of consensus would be okay. And I'm fine with fellow editors discussing whether or not it could/should be reinstated. Best wishes, Soulbust (talk) 07:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Having such a discussion is fine. The issue was, that when something controversial is removed for questionable sourcing from a BLP, it should never be reinserted without first discussing it. If the consensus is that the sourcing is in this instance sufficient, that is fine. But such allegations should, generally speaking, probably be sourced to something better than a clickbait mill. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Merryll Saylan

On 11 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Merryll Saylan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Merryll Saylan helped pioneer the application of color and the use of secondary materials in woodturning art (example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Merryll Saylan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Merryll Saylan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Precious

comedy as art

Thank you for quality articles about films such as your first The Trouble with Bliss, comedians such as PewDiePie for millions of readers, and women in art such as Merryll Saylan, for contributing to Simple English, for service from 2012, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2323 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:08, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Froggy Fresh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Baddest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Edits to Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/July 2 to 8, 2017

As the main editor on this particular Top 25 Report, I wanted to ask your thoughts on other editors changing or editing the content (see revision history). I've also notified Igordebraga. Thanks Shearonink (talk) 13:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

I think in general, minor tweaks are okay. For older reports, I think the content should stay about the same, unless there are factual errors included. Soulbust (talk) 15:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)