Sonntagsbraten

Welcome!

Hello, Sonntagsbraten, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- John of Reading (talk) 21:22, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Links to sections

Thank you for checking all those links in the "YEAR in Israel" articles. Note, though, that the articles look better if you copy the text of the link, eg "(2 bombings)", rather than the software's encoding of the link, eg ".282 bombings.29". The help page at Help:Section#Section linking doesn't make this clear. I think I've corrected them for you. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:22, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Your recent editing history at Lehi (group) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please note that this ar5ticle, like all articles relating to the Israel-Palestine conflict, is subject to a one-revert rule. You are already in breach of this; any repeat is likely to see you blocked from editing RolandR (talk) 13:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For great editing throughout. Jethro B 19:31, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

1RR

You have violated the 1RR several times. You have also repeatedly reverted without commenting on the talk page. If you continue doing so you may be blocked from editing. nableezy - 22:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

You violated 1RR :

• here
• here again
• and a few days ago here too

Pluto2012 (talk) 16:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

and here too Pluto2012 (talk) 16:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I thought the 1RR/24 hs rule applies only to certain articles where a special warning is written in the "edit" section (like here).--Sonntagsbraten (talk) 17:25, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

3RR applies to all articles but Arbcom decided to apply 1RR to all article related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict... So, take care of this issue... Pluto2012 (talk) 20:06, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

image

http://historiadeisrael.galeon.com/1_fase.htm is not a reliable source, and wikimedia isn't either. Please stop edit-warring. Zero^talk 00:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

You don't seem to understand the role of administrators. (I'm an administrator myself.) The fact remains you want to use an image from an unreliable source and give it a caption based on no evidence whatever. Read WP:BURDEN, it is a core policy. It is your duty to find reliable sources for material you insert. Zero^talk 00:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I thought the policy was "generally, Wikipedia assumes in good faith that image creators are correctly identifying the contents of photographs they have taken". Please explain why this is not the case here. Ankh.Morpork 19:09, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Who took the photo and where is their identification of its contents? Zero^talk 21:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)