August 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Gospel in Islam has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

   ==Speedy deletion nomination of Injil and caesar==
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Injil and caesar, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kathovo talk 12:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gospel of Barnabas, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gospel in Islam, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 14:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

easy edit

alah gampang, you can order your student to put your sentence in their books, then you put back that sentence in your article,

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Solfareno (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I hate hoax, you was block me when I did not active (you can see that warning only have a few second from other warning), you can see I didn't do that again in history, you should be more respect and fair to some article when that article have "other side"Solfareno (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. jpgordon::==( o ) 05:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.