Socrates SLB KA
Per WP:V, which is official project policy:
The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged should be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation.[1] The source should be cited clearly and precisely to enable readers to find the text that supports the article content in question.
If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.
Based on that policy, the primarysources template is appropriate. I have restored the template, and you may feel free to add it to any article that does not conform with policy. You should not remove this template until the issue is addressed. Knowingly removing valid editorial templates in contravention of policy would be vandalism. Erechtheus 11:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of any organization being any different. If they're not listing appropriate sources and it's of a concern to you, I encourage you to add the appropriate editorial template. See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Erechtheus 21:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- @Erechtheus, check the national website [1]. That's the GO TO source, but sometimes falls behind a week or two. My 2 cents. Nguerrero03 01:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
FLA on SLB Page edit
As written in the National List by one of the IBOD members, we are NOT a part of FLA. Please remove this edit from the SLB Page. Thanks bro. Nguerrero03 (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)