Your submission at Articles for creation: Bram van Sambeek (October 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:28, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bram van Sambeek (November 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Still extremely promotional.
K.e.coffman (talk) 23:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sobatipep! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 23:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bram van Sambeek (December 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 11:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bram van Sambeek has been accepted edit

 
Bram van Sambeek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Legacypac

Sobatipep (talk) 17:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: JEMcDonald (March 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Dan arndt thank you for your quick response even though it was a rejection. Removed the references you didn't approve of. However, I can't figure out what you refer to specifically with "minimum standard for inline citations." As to the significant coverage, does that mean that if someone is really niche and not a lot is published about them, their work, or their awards, the reference to the awards itself is insufficient? Thank you for your time! Sobatipep (talk) 09:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: JEMcDonald (March 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply