Smith03

Proposed deletion of Lutheran Study Bible

The article Lutheran Study Bible has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability and no reliable third-party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Basileias (talk) 14:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Fate of Chicago Machine

Hi. Do you follow pro Major League Lacrosse ? because I do not. But I read the [Ohio Machine] article as explaining that the Chicago Machine ORGANIZATION settled in Rochester even as an expansion team in Ohio team picked up the NAME "Machine." So I disambiguated "Chicago Machine' to Rochester rather than Ohio. What is your understanding? thanks Hugh (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

My undertanding of it based off the MLL website is that they consider the current Roch Rattlers ( who had been Chicago) to be a continueation of the old Rochester Rattlers who moved to Toronto in 2008? My understanding is that at least in some of the press releases they tie to current Ohio Machine to the Chicago Machine ( why they do that i haven't a clue) it really is confusing, I kind of gave up on the MLL when they started to do that. Smith03 (talk) 17:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I think I will cross-post this issue on the Chicago Machine disambiguation page, maybe we can attract an answer from a die-hard pro lacrosse fan. Hugh (talk) 17:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

another way to do it is just create Chicago Machine (MLL) Smith03 (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Chicago Machine (MLL)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chicago Machine (MLL), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://maps.thefullwiki.org/Chicago_Machine.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 19:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

NASL Indoor

thanks for the kudos. i loved the NASL (indoor and out) as a kid and want to do my part to keep known and accurate. unfortunately i have no info on the 1983 grand prix at the moment. but that doesn't mean i wont run across it at some point. i know that between 1977 and 1979 some "minor" cups and competitions were held. individual teams would sponsor them. even though NASL teams participated the league didn't officially sanction them like 1975, 1976 and the 1980s. i also read that there was something back in 1971 possibly NASL sanctioned, that Dallas won. until i can find more info on it, i'm hesitant to devote a separate page to it. specifically, i grew up a Rowdies fan and the local newspapers gave them amazing coverage with vivid accounts (often times they even had the box scores). so if Tampa Bay was involved, it actually makes the research and sourcing a bit easier. for instance, if i was so inclined i could write a detailed page on both the '75 and '76 indoor regionals in St. Petersburg. i really wish i could get a bit more info on the other regions, because there's some stuff i'd like to include on the existing pages, but i'd like to give equal time to each region. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativewill (talk • contribs) 15:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

how's this? 1983 NASL Grand Prix of Indoor Soccer -creativewill — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativewill (talk • contribs) 14:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

As I value your opinion, please go to my talk page and view the section at the bottom titled "Looking for some feedback"

Many thanks, Creativewill (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

NASL Indoor Arenas

I don't have a full list. I see that you've done so for the 1983-84 season. Since 83-84 had so few teams and was part of the NASL's last hurrah, I think it enhances that particular page. But doing so might clutter say, the 1980-81 season, which had 19 teams. In general it makes more sense to me to include that kind of info in the various teams' own wiki page and esp in their info-box. I haven't checked for that info specifically. How about you?--Creativewill (talk) 15:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

It seems spotty at best some teams have it most do not Smith03 (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicago Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NASL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of NCCAA men's basketball champions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Malone College

USFL Collegiate Draft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Los Angeles Express

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:LosAngelesRiptide PL.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:LosAngelesRiptide PL.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Correct Dates for Min vs Mem indoor series?

First of all many thanks for digging up those attendance figures, as I'm always happy to see things fully filled out. With regard to the date of that first match in the indoor semi-final series: I double checked several NPs and all seem to point to a 2/23 match date, which makes me think that the media guide has the typo. I even checked NPs from the surrounding days as well. This link for example from 2/23/80 (go to page 15 and zoom in on the upper right of the page) lists the game as taking place that afternoon. Since it was your edit, I'll let you decide which way to go on this. Again thanks for all your help on these pages. Creativewill (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Chicago and Ohio Machine Merger

I have made a formal merger proposal on Talk:Chicago Machine (MLL) if you would like to participate in the discussion. (Bes2224 (talk) 18:59, 10 August 2013 (UTC))

Proposed move

It has been proposed that Ottawa RedBlacks be renamed and moved to Ottawa Redblacks at Talk:Ottawa_RedBlacks. As you have commented on this article's name before, you may be interested in voting on the proposal. Regards, Ground Zero | t 13:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Date on NAIA championship

The 2013 NAIA Football National Championship was a 16-team tournament that spanned from November 23 through December 21, as the article it links to shows. True, the final game was played in one day but the whole championship was much broader. I have no idea why some of the older championships give a date, but that is likely because no article has been written for the entire tournament yet--or possibly, there was no tournament and simply two teams were picked. If you have questions, please let me know. And thanks for interest and enthusiasm on NAIA football!--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:11, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your thoughts

Go to my talk-page when you get a minute. I'd like an opinion on something. Thanks. -Creativewill (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Metrodome

I'm not going to revert, but for me, it's not about not liking corporate names on stadiums. Please don't assume motives. The fact is that only the field was the MOA field. The building was never the MOA field...even if they did add titles to the dome. --Onorem (talk) 01:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

• • I notice on a few stadium pages on Wikipedia a desire to avoid the corp name. I wasn't implying the specific person, but just in general a view that seems to show up from time to time. I recall back when candlestick park in SF was 3com park people want the page name candlestick. I notice the page for the 2000 Olympic stadium in Sydney uses the orginal name instead of the official corp bought name Smith03 (talk) 01:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure what your point is. The name of the building is/was HHH Metrodome. The MOA bought naming rights to the field that the Vikings played on. They didn't buy rights to change the name of the stadium. That would have required a legislative act. Some people might not like corporate sponsors, but that's not the issue here. --Onorem (talk) 01:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

• • • I am well aware the stadium name was not change. I live in Minnesota I added if you look at edit history a note that the stadium was also called moa field etc. yesterday another user reversed that using your argument about the stadium. I am not suggesting the page be moved. I just believe that in the opening para an acknowledgement of the name that was used for the last 5 seasons of the stadium by the main tenant. so I added that information back in.
      • Who said anything about moving the page? Never mind. Please don't answer. It's too hard to understand what you're actually trying to say. Good night. --Onorem (talk) 02:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC

I am not sure why you stuck your nose it in the first place good night yourself

Sorry. I guess I have one more response in me. I stuck my nose "it in" the first place because you are wrong. Your reversion was wrong. That you can't see why isn't my fault. Night. --Onorem (talk) 02:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

why is it wrong to add correct information to a page? oh never mind with a response we won't agree good night and pleasant dreams

As an admin, you are expected to know how BRD works. You boldly added something to the lead sentence of the Metrodome article. I reverted, because it was wrong, so now we discusss, not continue to revert. As it happens, this issue has been discussed at great length on the talk page, which I invite you to now visit. I will copy one thing from that here, which illustrates the issue:

• 
  This is
  the HHH Metrodome.
• 
  This is NOT
  Mall of America Field.
• 
  THIS is Mall of America Field (the green part of the photo).

Jonathunder (talk) 15:11, 19 February 2014 (UT

just forget it is time to leave this place

Orphaned non-free image File:Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan^(talk) 02:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Smith03! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 02:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 23:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012 MLL season by team

Template:2012 MLL season by team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lutheran Standard Bible (NRSV).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lutheran Standard Bible (NRSV).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Slab of Bacon Game

A tag has been placed on Template:Slab of Bacon Game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an unambiguous misrepresentation of established policy.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

File:TLSB.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TLSB.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TLSB.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TLSB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of state Constitution Parties for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of state Constitution Parties is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of state Constitution Parties until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2001 Major League Lacrosse Collegiate Draft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2001 Major League Lacrosse Collegiate Draft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001 Major League Lacrosse Collegiate Draft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seal of Minneapolis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Seal of Minneapolis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from ci.minneapolis.mn.us/clerk/clerk_minneapoliscityseal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  21:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Major League Lacrosse seasons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Major League Lacrosse seasons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Major League Lacrosse seasons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 03:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Major League Lacrosse Community Service Award for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Major League Lacrosse Community Service Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Lacrosse Community Service Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 06:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Major League Lacrosse Iron Lizard of the Year Award for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Major League Lacrosse Iron Lizard of the Year Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Lacrosse Iron Lizard of the Year Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 13:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Ann Richards) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ann Richards.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

not sure why this article was still on the new page curation list from 2003? ignore this message!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 14:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

"List of NFL champions" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of NFL champions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 16#List of NFL champions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1985 USFL season by team

Template:1985 USFL season by team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1983 USFL season by team

Template:1983 USFL season by team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1984 USFL season by team

Template:1984 USFL season by team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Big Ten Conference women's basketball regular season champions

The article List of Big Ten Conference women's basketball regular season champions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

tagged as unsourced in 2007

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Doug Shively

The article Doug Shively has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)