User talk:Slywriter/Archive 3

Latest comment: 3 months ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 13 February 2024

Qamar Javed Bajwa edits revert

@Slywriter, I see you have reverted some edits on Qamar Javed Bajwa's page. And you wrote the reason for reverting that the policy base reason was not given even though I clearly wrote why I am removing the text. Traitor trending on Twitter against the general and journalist Arshad Sharif's mother accusing the general of murder are routine and politically biased news, and it does not include any point of view from the general and besides Arshad Sharif's assassination case is still going on in the court which is yet to be decided.

If you read the general's talk page carefully, a political party in Pakistan and its followers have started a propaganda campaign against the general and they want to include this in the article. This is clear BLP violation and consider WP:NOTNEWS WP:ROUTINE news. I was very surprised You reverted these edits without doing any research. If you want input on this, please discuss on the general talk page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 10:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

M.Ashraf333, What I see is you blindly reverting multiple editors based on your false opinion that the Courts are required to weigh in before Wikipedia can cover a topic. If Reliable Sources are covering corruption concerns about a public figure, that's legitimate information for an encyclopedia. And last I checked, accusing someone of corruption and being a traitor is not routine. Slywriter (talk) 13:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

DN concern

[1] I'm requesting you back up this claim with sources or strike it, as it appears to be a complete and utter falsehood. No source = WP:OR DN (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Darknipples, Please show where the alleged 'utter falsehood' is. NYPost is not a source for politics, it is not used in this article and the "October Surprise" brought this matter into the public eye. So either show the falsehood or retract your claim here. Slywriter (talk) 03:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
After reading your rfc comment, I'm genuinely confused as to your concern with this statement. Chances of getting local or community consensus on anything controversial published by NY Post is close to nil, given it's listing at WP:RSP. Look at Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Kamilah Harris, Mike Pence, Twitter Files, Saddam Hussein. You will find WaPo, maybe even HuffPo but no NYPo. Slywriter (talk) 05:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps I misunderstood your claim. The NYP was first to break the HBL controversy AFAIK. Are you saying this is not the case? While the NYP may not be used as a direct source, it is still being used/referred to by secondary sources to follow this controversy. It is quite the "loophole" (for lack of a better term) for a generally unreliable source to make it's way into WP, as catalyst at the very least IMO. DN (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Dn, the NY Post did indeed break the story. However, investigative journalism is a primary source by policy. So it immediately starts with limited use.
Add in it's reputation and it becomes almost impossible to use as a source for controversial statements including/especially in the HBL article.
Secondary sources are being used to interpret the article as we would on other subjects.
Can see that as a loophole but really a lot of the exclusion comes from being a primary source.
As to generally unreliable, the ruling is actually quite narrow, but in practice eliminates it as sole source for any political fact.
Not saying I agree with all of this, but it's a fair assessment of the reality of the NY Post on Wikipedia.
Think that covers it all. If there's still something in the statement that concerns you, let me know.
Slywriter (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Darknipples ping Slywriter (talk) 04:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

H. Biden, the saga continues

FWIW - There's is going to be a 'small' number of editors who'll never accept that Hunter Biden owned the laptop. GoodDay (talk) 02:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

GoodDay, it's incredibly frustrating as there is no good reason to hide the owner of the laptop. It doesn't change the story and hiding it in the face of overwhelming coverage by RS just makes Wikipedia look like it does indeed have a US left-wing bias, as opposed to the general liberal bias, we are soooo proud of. /s Slywriter (talk) 02:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Well, we've got 1RR DS for that page, thank goodness. GoodDay (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
GoodDay, yeah just have to solve the riddle that is filing an AE Report. Seriously, did nobody ever learn less is more before writing the comments. Then once you figure out how to file, hope an Admin cares to get involved as it's clear the community has decided to leave editors fending for themselves. Yes, I am a tad annoyed that ANI has ignored the issues. Slywriter (talk) 02:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Will be interesting, to see how the ongoing RFC concludes. GoodDay (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

I thank you for not deleting/hatting my post, which is a response to TFD's post. It's frustrating when an editor tries to control a talkpage. GoodDay (talk) 05:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

I didn't see it as off topic. Also, I'm quite tired of those looking to immediately start a fight instead of a discussion. Slywriter (talk) 05:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
GoodDay Ping Slywriter (talk) 05:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Well, I've re-worded my post. To put an end to the deleting/hatting attempts. GoodDay (talk) 05:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Moved DN concern to separate thread.

It's not gonna end, until (IMHO) one editor gets banned from the page or at least its talkpage. PS - No need to respond to me. GoodDay (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

@GoodDay, :) As far as I can tell talk page disruption is not an AE enforceable matter, otherwise it would have been opened today. ANI pointless for AP2 incivil content disputes and as one admin opined in an unrelated matter today 'can just ignore them' on the talk page. So, really just waiting for this pop on a noticeboard. Sources are clear that it's his laptop. Clearer than many realize after today. But if others want to fight a futile battle, so be it. Slywriter (talk) 03:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

Industrial laundry

Hi there,

Would it be possible to speak to you about the [Industrial laundry] article being blanked please? There are significant differences between residential and industrial laundry, take a look at some of the machinery needed for instance (on photos on the article).

The fact that I haven't spotted it until 8 years later doesn't make a difference, I've spotted it now. I thought all of the sources I'd added would've helped?

What do I need to do to get this to a state where you don't say it's unsourced please? I've made about 20 edits to it but you've rolled back all of them.

Thanks!

Control-alt-delete ★ usertalkfavs 15:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

@Control-alt-delete, actual independent sourcing. Restoring an unsourced mess and tacking on a few sources in random places does not accomplish anything. The original article should likely be forgotten and a new one written, if the topics are different and such differences are covered in reliable sources. Slywriter (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I added a large number of sources. Many of these were independent in the sense they came from government authorities websites. I’m not sure what I can do other than continue to add more sources? They’re not in random places, and many of the sources I added appear to be the original places they were written. I’ll add some more sources at some point soon then ping you once I’ve done it; when I have some more time. Thanks! Control-alt-delete ★ usertalkfavs 00:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello Slywriter,

 
New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

New pages patrol needs your help!

 
New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Slywriter,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Slywriter,

 
New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

November Articles for creation backlog drive

 

Hello Slywriter:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2500 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

The Signpost: 13 February 2024