Welcome!

Hello, Slkearns, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Syrthiss (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Improving the Accuride article edit

I just noticed your comments on the Talk:Accuride_International page, and have used them to improve the article. One thing: you mention that Accuride has 1500 employees, citing the Accuride Web site, but I don't see that figure anywhere on the site, so for now I'm using the Hoover's figure of 2000 employees. Can you provide better documenation of the headcount? Thanks, --Macrakis (talk) 21:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Improving the Accuride Page edit

Hi,

Forgive me if I am responding incorrectly. I haven't posted often enough to remember all the rules and guidelines. Thanks for your revisions to the page. I'm not sure where the Hoover's info came from, however in checking with our HR director, he confirmed our worldwide staff is about 2,000 these days. Other than his confirmation, I do not have anything else to confirm staff count. That was my concern in that I could not locate any reference to cite for that particular point. However if Hoovers is an acceptable source, that's fine.

Regards,

Slkearns (talk) 00:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply