User talk:Skysmith/Missing topics about Astronomy

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Loooke in topic Comments

Comments

edit

Here's some comments:

Age of solar system? Shouldn't that be Age of the Solar System?
X-ray background radiation - we already have that... X-ray background
Double Cluster in Perseus -- we already have that, see Double Cluster
HLIRG means Hyperluminous infrared galaxy, and it is contained in the article for LIRGs (luminous infrared galaxy) which also contains the ULIRG info. That should just redirect there.
Lyman-break galaxy already exists, just redirect Lyman break galaxy there.
dE galaxy, we have that, dwarf elliptical galaxy, just redirect it there.
Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy, we have that, Sag dSph, see Sagittarius Dwarf Elliptical Galaxy, just redirect it there
United Theory of Active Galaxies -- the unified model is in the active galaxy article
AO620-OO -- that just looks wrong. Don't you mean A0620-00 or something?
Circinus X-I -- that's just wrong. It's Circinus X-1
Planet pulsar -- do you mean pulsar planet ?
Contact Binary Star Envelopes -- do you mean contact binary or common envelope ?
Pulsating star -- do you mean variable star ?
Ae star -- that just doesn't look like an "individual star"
h and Chi Persei -- do you mean NGC 884 ?
Superterrestrial -- do you mean Super-Earth ?
Muses-A mission -- that's a space probe, and it already has an article, see MUSES-A
Mercury-Atlas 11 & Mercury-Atlas 12 should redirect to Project Mercury - there were cancelled.

65.94.253.16 (talk) 06:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

as mentioned previously, Hyperluminous IRAS galaxy is wrong, it is hyperluminous infrared galaxy (HLIRG) 65.94.253.16 (talk) 05:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ascracus Mons looks like a misspelling of Ascraeus Mons. -84user (talk) 22:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Dark flocculi usually describes the appearance of Solar prominences when viewed against the solar disk in certain wavelengths; I've expanded Solar prominence and made the disambig flocculus link there. -84user (talk) 23:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

70.29.208.247 (talk) 06:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Here are some articles in here that already exist, but were misspelled:

Also, I think we should add the Taurus-Auriga Star Forming Region. Loooke (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply