"Regula Monachorum" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Regula Monachorum and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7 § Regula Monachorum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Propylene tetramer edit

  Hello, Skysmith. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Propylene tetramer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

A pie for you! edit

  Thank you for helping editors fill in missing articles on the history of China! Special:Contributions/TheSands-12 04:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Propylene tetramer edit

 

Hello, Skysmith. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Propylene tetramer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jean-Pierre Schecroun for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Pierre Schecroun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Pierre Schecroun (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Anisophylly" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Anisophylly has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 10 § Anisophylly until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I've redirected a lot of the new ones, and plan to do an article on English enamels at some point; this will remove more. Thanks for doing these updates. Johnbod (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Andreas Karavis for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Karavis, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Karavis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Christ-Catholics" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Christ-Catholics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 15 § Christ-Catholics until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 19:58, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Methylene iodite" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Methylene iodite has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Methylene iodite until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Epicurus And Epicureanism" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Epicurus And Epicureanism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 12 § Epicurus And Epicureanism until a consensus is reached. Loafiewa (talk) 02:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Armour-Piercing, High Explosive edit

 

The article Armour-Piercing, High Explosive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

duplicate of the other page 'Armour-piercing high-explosive' or 'Armour-piercing high explosive', it is badly named with (comma and capitalisation), all pages linked here will be moved to 'Armour-piercing high-explosive'

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Pair Annihilation" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Pair Annihilation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 27 § Pair Annihilation until a consensus is reached. Jason Quinn (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Acanthoid" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Acanthoid has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 31 § Acanthoid until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 03:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Spondylous" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Spondylous has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 31 § Spondylous until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply