Wikipedia has turned into a blog for infantile tantrums, which is why I don't edit here anymore.

Zealots edit

Don't let the zealots wear you down. WP is in sore need of balance on a wide variety of global warming climate change articles. Fell Gleaming(talk) 03:15, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

It might be better to just let Wikipedia's climate change articles complete their transformation into obvious jokes. SkipSmith (talk) 02:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Arthur Rubin Delete edit

Could use some help on Arthur Rubin delete request. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Euro-Voice (talkcontribs) 14:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just letting you know that the above canvassing single purpose attack account is been confirmed as a sockpuppet of another single purpose attack account. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
 

The article African Americans in Davenport, Iowa is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Americans in Davenport, Iowa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.