Skarloey15

Thomas and Friends Bachmann Models

Thomas and Friends Bachmann Models has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 01:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Raymond.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Raymond.GIF. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Fan fiction on your user page

Per our user page policy please do not include your fan fiction on your user page. Wikipedia is not a free web host. Thanks, Gwernol 18:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Eurovision Song Contest 2010

Just a courtesy note to inform you that I have reverted the speculation you placed about the Dutch Antilles in the aforementioned article for two reasons :

• Foremost, because you placed it just before 3 links which make no reference to this speculation, it gives the false impression that the references support your speculation;
• Secondly, even if you had placed it elsewhere without any citation, the information and the phrasing used are far too vague to be encyclopedic.

Regards, -- Alexandr Dmitri (Александр Дмитрий) (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)