Your submission at Articles for creation: Golden sheen sapphire has been accepted

edit
 
Golden sheen sapphire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question about Golden_sheen_sapphire

edit

  Hello, Sjwaddington! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about Golden_sheen_sapphire at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Sjwaddington, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 07:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Jim1138 (talk) 07:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Golden sheen sapphire

edit

I undid your restore as it returned numerous external inline links. They need to be a help:footnote - help:referencing for beginners. The footnote needs to support that the group or company do issue certficiates. Avoid the use of wp:primary sources. For instance, if AIGS does issues certificates, it should be supported by a wp:RS secondary source.
Also, please avoid describing well-seasoned Wikipedia editors' edits as wp:vandalism. Their edits look pretty much legitimate and constructive to me. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please keep this discussion on this page

edit

I get a lot of talk added to my page and loose track of discussions. Please use wp:Notifications.
I see your point. It appears that the IPs may have good intentions. The one you attempted to contact only made one edit as that IPA and my or may not be the same as the others. See wp:assume good faith. Also, see wp:ownership of content. Many people's IP addresses change from never to often, to just about every edit. It can be difficult to communicate with an IP 'running amok'. You might get an idea if they are the same with geolocate. If you click on the IP's "user contributions" and at the bottom, click on "geolocate" it will state where the IPA is assigned. Some do use an open proxy and some may travel so locations may be uncertain. The IPs geolocate to Fargo, ND, Los Angeles, and Denver, CO. So they may be different.
Please feel free to restore, but avoid restoring the inline external links such as 'LOTUS', etc. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Jim1138: Hi Jim, ok, thanks for the information, I appreciate your advice. I have reverted the page and I think removed the inline external links. I note that my IP address was reported as an open proxy and I was edit blocked, but I am just using a normal ISP address from my service provider in Bangkok. Sjwaddington (talk) 08:51, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply