Sixtrees66

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugene Joseph Pelc (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Sixtrees66! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Eugene Joseph Pelc Article

@Curb Safe Charmer:

Dear Curb Safe Charmer

Regarding your assessment of the Eugene Joseph Pelc ‎page, I collected this information through 1st person interview with the Pelc family. I have added a related 3rd party references they provided me, but there is not much more independent referral information online or in print form to substantiate the biographical information. What would you suggest?

@Sixtrees66: If there are no more reliable sources to substantiate what you've written about Pelc then the draft fails Wikipedia's verifiability policy and is therefore not suitable for inclusion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

@Curb Safe Charmer:

Thanks again. Regarding additional sources versus those provided here. They are all quite strong and direct 3rd party references in support of the information I have provided in the biographical overview. I have read through the "notability" requirements and, as the references provided in the article seem to demonstrate quite clearly, he does appear to fit at least one or more of the Wikipedia qualifiers...

Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals: The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

Would you be able to provide me with some insight as to why they are insufficient?

@Curb Safe Charmer:

@Sixtrees66: Another editor will take a closer look at those references and assess the notability. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

While they currently at the end of the article, would it be better for me to link those references directly to the article at the relevant locations?

@Sixtrees66: Yes, it would be much better if there were inline references. See WP:REFBEGIN for how to do this. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugene Joseph Pelc (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@Curb Safe Charmer: Thank you very much for the suggestions and I will continue working on improving the reference base for this article. I will also try out the Teahouse as recommended.

~ Amkgp 💬 14:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ermes Primiano Culos

Hello, Sixtrees66. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ermes Primiano Culos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc

Hello, Sixtrees66. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc

Hello, Sixtrees66. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eugene Joseph Pelc".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)