Sickero

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Tom Metzger do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://ca.youtube.com/user/tommetzger) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Category:Surenos

Hello, Sickero. You have new messages at Calvin 1998's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion of White fence

A tag has been placed on White fence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jons63 (talk) 00:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

what kind of copy right tag would i need for a booking photo from jail ? 05:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Your best would be to have a GFDL picture and to follow the requirement as stated at WP:IMAGE. You should try to avoid showing the peoples faces if possible because identifiable features of and individual generally require their permission to be published (depending on what country you come from). For example, if you took a picture of your neighbor getting out of prison, you probably would need his permission to post the picture at jail. However, if you took a picture of Britney Spears or Paris Hilton getting out of jail or being booked then most like you should be ok because these are popular figures and are expected to be photographed. (Since this is Wikipedia though someone will probably argue that such a picture should be under those people's articles and not jail.... hence again... you'll probably need to get a picture of some model that has agree to have their picture taken or to which you can't specifically ID. --CyclePat (talk) 05:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I've removed the tag that claims that the picture could be deleted since I believe it is fairly well described with your template that this picture is of or from a federal state prison. Howewver you should still provide a link (you you took it from the web). Take a look at my contribution of images here. In particular you could use the template box from template:information which is demonstrated at Image:VenetianShoe.jpg, etc... of some images I uploaded. Alas, I've added the tag that you photo requires references.--CyclePat (talk) 06:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Another very handy tool is www.easybib.com which can help you make a good reference and keep most of the information you add into the encyclopedia! --CyclePat (talk) 06:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, the link need fixing in the fair use rational. It should link to the article it is being used in and if necessary add your own words to explain why instead of just using a template. Bye--CyclePat (talk) 06:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mj.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mj.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Mj.jpeg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Mj.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PeterSymonds | talk 08:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mj.jpeg

Hi Sickero. Every image needs a tag to tell the reader where the image came from. So for instance, if the image was scanned, you need to say where it was scanned from. If it was taken from a website, you need to provide the link. Copy this into the image, under the heading "Summary", and fill in the information after the "=" sign:

{{Information
|Description=
|Source=
|Date=
|Author=
|Permission=
|other_versions=
}}

and then fill out the boxes. Secondly, it doesn't look to me like a Public Domain image, because the Federal Government itself didn't create it (from the tag "This only applies to works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision.") The image is currently unused, as the related article doesn't exist yet. The fair use policy is one article minimum (See WP:Non-free content#Policy). If it's not used within 48 hours, the image will be deleted. If you create the article, you must provide a rationale like this, which you should add to the image:

==Fair use in [[ARTICLENAME]]==
{{Non-free use rationale
|Article=
|Description=
|Source=
|Portion=
|Low_resolution=
|Purpose=
|Replaceability=
|other_information=(Optional)
}}

The source tag is there for now until these issues have been addressed. Hope this helps, and if you need further assistance, don't hesitate to contact me. Best, PeterSymonds | talk 10:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mj.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mj.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mj.jpeg and copyright status

To be honest I'm not sure of the exact details. I've placed the image up for Fair Use Review, so someone else can determine whether this image qualifies. It's orphaned though, so if you don't intend to use it in the next few days, it will be deleted. If you want to use it later on, you can re-upload providing that the criteria for fair use is properly labelled. Best, PeterSymonds | talk 12:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jon1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Jon1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

What is a gang taskforce?

JButera (JButera)jbutera 15:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good as long as you require all members of the taskforce to get bonafided wikipedia accounts. I will not participate in a group which accepts users who use ip addresses, and don't have the courage to create an account and let people know something about them. I will not participate if a tackforce allows individuals - or internet bangers to join. (JButera)jbutera 08:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Sickero. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that:

You do not yet have enough experience (usually over 250 edit) in the main namespace.

Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Ale_Jrb^talk 15:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Klassen.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Klassen.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

NAFTA

Let me know what you think about this. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 20:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

This user supports NAFTA.

File:Mj2.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mj2.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:P-neta3.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:P-neta3.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 10:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:P-emc.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:P-emc.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Bog turtle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 07:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Faggot. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 07:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Glenn Beck. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Grafen (talk) 07:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to RuPaul. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Grafen (talk) 07:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Violations of policies on Vandalism and Biography of living persons.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Mitbook.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mitbook.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nortenotag.jpg

The file File:Nortenotag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)