Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Shiriu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Anderson Silva. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Falcon8765 (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of football clubs in Portugal by major honours won edit

 

The article List of football clubs in Portugal by major honours won has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mostly WP:OR and WP:SYNTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of football clubs in Portugal by major honours won for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of football clubs in Portugal by major honours won is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football clubs in Portugal by major honours won until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unexplained removal of material from Merrick Garland edit

You've twice deleted information from this article without providing any explanation in the edit summary, and twice other editors have reverted your edits. If you have some reason why you think this information should be deleted, you need to explain that. If you don't explain - even if there really is a good reason - then other editors will consider your edits to be vandalism. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 05:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply