Welcome!

Hello, Shirakatsi1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Armenian Constitutional Right-Protective Centre, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 02:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Armenian Constitutional Right-Protective Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 02:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

How can I establish the notability of this page? I would have thought that the work done by the organisation makes it notable? Please offer advice on how to better adhere to wikipedia criteria to avoid deletion of the ACRPC page. Thank you.

Shirakatsi1 (talk) 04:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Shirakatsi1Reply

HI. Notability is established in Wikipedia by having as statement in the article that "asserts it's notability" - explains why it is important, rather than just some run of the mill entity. That statement, as well as any other assertions in the article should be verifiable by checking the article against reliable third-party sources - in other words, by looking at things written about them, rather than things they write about themselves. For now, because it is a "proposed deletion", if you are sure you can fix the article, go remove the prod tag, and perhaps put an {{underconstruction}} tag there to make it clear that you are still working on it, and you can discuss it on the article's talk page.. Triona (talk) 04:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I understand about the third-party sources. However, most information written in external evaluation of ACRPC is all in paper format. I could talk to the organisation to suggest that this information could be loaded to the ACRPC website, but the problem there is that then all references would come from the ACRPC website itself, despite the fact that the uploaded documents would be independent. Could that be a potential solution?

I would suggest to look for 3rd party websites such as news sources or reviews on the article you are witting about.Typically having sources come from a website or news sources other then the official website of the company organization or person. If i may suggest that you look at Wikipedia:N as Triona stated before as well as WP:Cite. I hope that helps if you have anymore questions please feel free to drop me a line.-- Staffwaterboy Critique Me 08:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Shirakatsi1 (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Shirakatsi1Reply