avatar laser lightning plasma is my grand finale passion fashion, planet of earth including apes u are all my goombah vaders anti darth vader lightning bolt galvinators

Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —teb728 t c 10:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Clarification of my reply at the Help desk edit

What I sugested at the Help desk the following and the like:

3D display
A Journey to the Center of the Earth
Abbe number
...

teb728 t c 10:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please read the answers edit

You have been asking many questions at the Help Desk, but it looks as if you haven't been reading the answers carefully enough. People have been giving you clear instructions, and they have been giving links to where further information is available. Please take the time to read the advice you have been given, and to follow the links which you have been given (including those in the Welcome message at the top of this page). The information is there if you read it. - David Biddulph (talk) 20:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sub-categories edit

Here comes the next complication! If you go to the Category:Plasma physics page you'll see that at the top there are nine "sub-categories" - and if you click those you may find "sub-sub-categories", and so on. Now, the usual rule here is that if an article is in a sub-category it shouldn't also be in the main category. So your edit at Plasma arc waste disposal is technically incorrect, I'm afraid, because Category:Plasma processing is a sub-category of Category:Plasma physics.

I don't see this mentioned anywhere at Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization, but it is mentioned at Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing pages if you want to read about it. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh sorry thanks is there a way to put these articles linking to plasma category with out being in plasma category. Or is that not good to do. This is why I created List of plasma (physics) applications articles so You could see all elements of plasma physics instead of having to find them in sub categories and some sub categories dont have all plasma actions equations and sources. Still debating about the name do You have any ideas.Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma (talk) 20:51, 23 November 2011 (UTC) Plasma oscillation is still there to in plasma physics category there's a sub category saying waves in plasma that has plasma oscillation is that in exception is it allowed as long as its notable. Can some plasma words be an exception to be added. Maybe as long as plasma physics category doesn't get to big its possibly good to add more plasma words or is that a rule not to do that.Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Provided the article is in one of the sub-categories, sub-sub-categories, etc, then there is no need to link it to Category:Plasma physics. If a reader jumps from an article to a sub-category page, such as Category:Plasma processing, then the "parent" categories are listed at the bottom (There are three in this case). This is one of the standard ways in which Wikipedia articles are linked together by subject-matter.
Yes, Plasma oscillation is in both the parent category and the sub-category. The parent category was added in this edit in 2006. I can't tell if this was a mistake, or was deliberately added as an exception.
I don't think you should add any more "See also" links to your new article without further discussion with more physics specialists, perhaps at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics. That would be a good forum to discuss the best name for the article, too, before adding many links that will have to be changed if the article is renamed again. -- John of Reading (talk) 22:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited List of plasma (physics) articles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks I deleted WHP maybe one day wafer handling plasma will become a real article.Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma (talk) 19:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

thence edit

hi,

My English grammar isn't perfect therefore I'm really good at looking up words :D

This edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Telluric_current&diff=next&oldid=453919713

http://www.onelook.com/?w=thence&ls=a

Thenceforth I haven't been able to figure out what is the intended use thereof exactly but it definitely means something.

enjoy, 84.106.26.81 (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wow I guess it does mean something, telluric currents are awesome I love anything You can harness.Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma (talk) 03:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mountain Banshee edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mountain Banshee, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hallelujahmountains.com/avatar-wallpaper-mountain-banshee/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Index of energy articles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Atomic energy, Zero energy, Energy independence, Energy absorber and Energy flow

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Shall I delete the Disambiguation links. Sorry did not know. What if they lead to other energy topic links is it okay to leave it as it is.Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited List of infrared articles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Infrared cutoff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of laser articles for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of laser articles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of laser articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Curb Chain (talk) 10:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of plasma (physics) articles for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of plasma (physics) articles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of plasma (physics) articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Curb Chain (talk) 11:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of infrared articles for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of infrared articles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of infrared articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Curb Chain (talk) 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP:SOCK edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma. Thank you. Curb Chain (talk) 05:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Halo plasma was my brothers account that I told him to comment on his own will on my articles about to be deleted, plasma laser is my other account I use for a extra watch list.Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma (talk) 06:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

From WP:MEAT:"Do not recruit your friends, family members, or communities of people who agree with you for the purpose of coming to Wikipedia and supporting your side of a debate. If you feel that a debate is ignoring your voice, remain civil, and seek comments from other Wikipedians or pursue dispute resolution. These are well-tested processes, designed to avoid the problem of exchanging bias in one direction for bias in another."

I have therefore blocked your brother's account as it is obvious violation of this policy. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of laser articles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Laser cladding, LAM, Fuser, Laser eye surgery, Gaser, Heat vision, Laser vision and Laser isotope separation
Index of radiation articles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Radiation and health

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 28 edit

Hi. When you recently edited List of emerging technologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unmanned vehicle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply