Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2017 edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". many of your edits marked as minor are not e.g. introduce new content etc Widefox; talk 11:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits to Progressive web applications edit

I saw your recent edits to Progressive web applications page and have a few comments: 0. I'm glad you are interested in contributing to the article 1. I believe the information you added is not relevant to the article because:

1. PouchDB, RxDB, GunDB, Hood.ie are not standard browser APIs, some are libraries built on top of IndexedDB, others do not run in browser at all (as far as I know).
2. PouchDB, RxDB, GunDB, Hood.ie are not noteworthy by themselves (lack third-party sources) in the context of PWAs. They are just a few out of many libraries libraries a developer can use. Even Angular, jQuery and Bootstap (all general page element frameworks) are more noteworthy in the context of PWAs. I'd say they are not noteworthy even outside of PWAs. E.g, Hoodie (software) gets about 5 page views a day and its website does not do much better.
3. Inclusion of these libraries on Wikipedia looks like advertisement of them for potential readers due to the lack of any reliable sources.

If you don't mind, I'll revert those edits.

Sincerely, Anton.bersh (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Well, I would agree on Hood.ie, down to its low perception yet. Nonetheless, databases are important for developing PWAs and IndexedDB is really not the only choice here. It is not the only way PWAs are build and has the call of being super convoluted in its API design, which is why idb exists. I am fully aware of the implications of a default browser API, why this alone is too less in order to inform somebody about the real world scenarios. I could imagine that we explicitly mention them all together in one separate section. What do you think? ShalokShalom (talk)

Let's move this discussion to Talk:Progressive web applications (I posted this here because originally I didn't expect this to become a lengthy discussion.) Anton.bersh (talk) 00:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Creatures 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAOS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply