Severian79

Welcome!

Hello, Severian79, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Marta Gómez, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ronk01 talk 21:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marta Gómez

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marta Gómez, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ronk01 talk 21:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Casa Verde. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hallows AG (talk) 05:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Your article would be welcomed on the Manga wikia. Please consider joining us there

I see they forgot to tell you that the article you created, Pajama na Kanojo, has been nominated for deletion. I went ahead and exported its full history to the Manga Wikia. Your contributions will be safe and welcomed there. http://manga.wikia.com/wiki/Pajama_na_Kanojo Dream Focus 23:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Casa Verde concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Casa Verde, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Casa Verde

Hello Severian79. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Casa Verde.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Casa Verde}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm Ruby Murray. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Paul Bernardo, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ruby Murray 07:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Fantomas

Hello Severian79. I saw your addition to the article on the character Fantomas and I just wanted to let you know that, although it's nice to see additions to the article, your edition should be included into the main body of the article in a description section. This information is also unsourced and needs to be given proper citations. Hopefully you can correct this issue.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Severian79. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Crab Silvers moved to Draft:Crab Silvers

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Crab Silvers has been moved to Draft:Crab Silvers. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

1. reliable source - see WP:RS
2. primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
3. verification - see WP:V
4. notability - see WP:N
5. citing source - see WP:Citing sources and WP:Tutorial/Citing sources
6. citing from internet sourc - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing {{ping|CASSIOPEIA}} (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Severian: Good day. Thank you for adding the source and body inline citation and I have moved the page to article space. However, I could not review the page for you since the sources are in Chinese, instead you have to wait for other pattroller to review the page for you. To say that the backlog is huge so, it would take a while for the page to be reviewed. Thank you for the contribution. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 22:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Annual Shogi Awards

Hi Severian79. I see that you have created the article Annual Shogi Awards. There's nothing wrong with creating articles per se, but if you're going to be translating articles from another language Wikipedia (for example, Japanese Wikipedia) or copying content witten by others from other Wikipedia articles, you need to be aware of Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Translation. Wikipedia's licensing reuirements allow free re-use of content you find in articles, but it does require that proper attribution be given. So, you need to be careful here because even copying-and-pasting or translating content from one article to another can be considered a copyright violation if not properly done.

In addition, English Wikipedia's standards and Manual of style, etc. as well as the expected level of English tend to be a higher than some other language Wikipedia's. For example, Japanese Wikipedia places citations before punctuation, but English Wikipedia follows WP:REFPUNC. There are other difference as well, especially regarding how reliable sources are defined and how they can be used, etc. You also shouldn't really be creating redundant or duplicate articles like Ishida Style when a similar article such as Ishida (shogi). Creating what is basically a duplicate article of one that already exists causes unneccesary confusion and clean up; so, it's better to work on improving the already existing article instead. If you're not sure how to do that, discuss things on the article's talk page and see what others say. Ish ishwar has been creating lots of articles about shogi-related matters and is quite familiar with the Wikipedia's preferred way of formatting them, etc. Maybe you can work together with Ish ishwar to improve those articles which have already been created.

Just some suggestions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:57, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Shogi articles

Hi Severian79. The additions you added about "Playing style" to Yoshiharu Habu and Yasumitsu Satō are interesting. I'm not sure if this is content you found on Japanese Wikipedia and just translated yourself, or if it came from somewhere else. If it's a case of the former, please remember that the overall standards for inclusion on English Wikipedia tend to be more rigorous than they do for Japanese Wikipedia, and that unsourced content (particularly in WP:BLPs), can be removed at anytime. So, it's best to try and support things with a citation whenever possible, unless it's something completely obvious like WP:BLUE. In addition, the way citations are formatted on English Wikipedia might be a bit different to what you're used, so please take a look at WP:REFB, WP:CITEHOW and WP:CITEVAR for a bit more on that. Once again, English Wikipedia tends to define reliable sources much more rigorously than other language Wikipedias, so the sources used for example on Japanese Wikipedia might not be acceptable for English Wikipedia. Japanese language sources can be used on English Wikipedia per WP:NOTENG, but they require a bit more formatting and shouldn't just be copied-and-pasted into an English Wikipedia article.

Finally, if you are translating content in another language Wikipedia into English for use in an article on English Wikipedia, you need to be aware of WP:PATT, WP:CWW, (WP:TFOLWP) and Wikipedia:Translation. Wikipedia's licensing does allow content from one language Wikipedia to be translated into another language Wikipedia, but proper attribution to the original source is still required; otherwise, the content can technically be considered a WP:COPYVIO. All you need to do is state in your edit sums where the original content can be found and that you've translated it into English. Also, if you're translating cited content, you should try to verify it yourself by examining the source whenever possible or at least provide a link to the source so that others can verify it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Three-Pawn Sacrifice Rapid Attack

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Severian79, thanks for creating Three-Pawn Sacrifice Rapid Attack!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced BLP sections

Hi Severian79. You need to be careful about adding unsourced content to articles, particularly WP:BLPs like you did at Toshiyuki Moriuchi#Playing style. English Wikipedia is probably much more rigorous about this type of thing than some other language Wikipedias, and unsourced content often quickly is removed. So, you need to support any assertions or claims made, particularly anything like MOS:OPED or WP:WEASEL, whenever possible because those things which tend to be removed first. I realize that lots of the information you’re probably adding can be found on Japanese Wikipedia, but Wikipedia is not an acceptable reliable source per WP:WPNOTRS and much of the content added to Japanese Wikipedia would not be considered acceptable for inclusion in English Wikipedia.

I previously touched on thi kind of thing above in #Shogi articles, and I’m not trying to discourage you from contributing. It is important to stress though that article content on English Wikipedia needs to comply with relevant English Wikipedia policies and guidelines; so, what might be OK on another Wikipedia should not automatically be considered to be OK on English Wikipedia. — Marchjuly (talk) 23:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Severian79. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco José de Caldas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Engineer Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Flowering Heart moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Flowering Heart, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Flowering Heart 2

Hello, Severian79. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flowering Heart 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flowering Heart 2 (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flowering Heart 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Flowering Heart 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Severian79! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Email question

I saw your email question. I'm not sure if there's one best way to translate such a thing. I personally prefer to use romanji readings whenever possible, unless there's a well-established English translation of a term already being commonly-used. The translations you suggested seem OK, but there's always a risk that it might be different from how something as been referred to up until now. That's doesn't make it wrong, just something to consider. You might want to as Ish ishwar about this since he has been doing most of the work on shogi castle related articles. You can also try WT:JAPAN for possibly more general perspective on this. From a Wikipedia standpoint, the page can always be WP:MOVED if there's a consensus that it needs to be retitled for some reason.

If you do translate a Japanese Wikipedia article (even partially) as part of your efforts to create an English article, please remember what I posted above at #Annual Shogi Awards and #Shogi articles. Please look at WP:MACHINETRANSLATION for reference as well. Good luck. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Flowering Heart 2

Hello, Severian79. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Flowering Heart 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Yōryū Fourth File Rook moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yōryū Fourth File Rook, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)