Speedy deletion of "Gautam Bose" edit

 

A page you created, Gautam Bose, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Gautam Bose edit

 

I have nominated Gautam Bose, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautam Bose. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ukexpat (talk) 12:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please make your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautam Bose. Note that the discussion is about notability as defined by Wikipedia (see WP:BIO) which needs to be supported by reliable sources - see WP:RS. – ukexpat (talk) 15:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I cannot delete the article as I am not at admin. You have a few more days for the Afd to run its course so you can add sources or you can blank the article now and add {{db-author}} in its place and and admin will delete it soon. – ukexpat (talk) 20:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


Welcome edit

   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200


Hello, Serialmarketer, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

    Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    How to edit a page
    Help
    Tips
    How to write a great article
    Manual of Style
    Fun stuff...
    Be Bold
    Assume Good faith
    Keep cool
    Ask an experienced editor to adopt you
    Policy on neutral point of view

And here are several pages on things to avoid:

  How not to spam
  How to avoid copyright infringement
  What Wikipedia is not
  How not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this!
  The Three-Revert-Rule and how to avoid breaking it

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) - if you click on the   button it will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, please consider joining the the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your first experiences here. Ukexpat Again, welcome! 


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Click here to reply to this message.


ukexpat (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your message on my talk page edit

Thanks for your message. Please see the above welcome message for some useful links. I think the basic problem is revealed by your message where you say, "i [sic] need the article for publicity". Please read WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not an advertising service, it is an encyclopedia, and any "articles" that appear to be promotional will be speedily deleted. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 21:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but wanting more people to know about your organization is promotion and not the purpose of an encyclopedia. You also have a huge conflict of interest -- if your organisation really is notable someone else will create an encyclopedic article about it eventually. – ukexpat (talk) 22:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply