Sepadem1

February 2017

Hello, I'm Justeditingtoday. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Pat Toomey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Justeditingtoday (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Pat Toomey. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, the sentences in question are both based on opinion and inaccurate. They should be removed.Sepadem1 (talk) 20:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

The parts in question are referenced reliably. Wikipedia is about verifiability and not truth. You have offered nothing to rebut what you claim are inaccurate sources. Please take it to the article talk page if you would like to argue about sourcing. Justeditingtoday (talk) 21:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Sepadem1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sepadem1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)