Scoopczar
Welcome! edit
|
June 2010 edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- The point is that you use the talk page, and once consensus is reached then you edit the article again. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for informing me of the three-revert rule. I am new as an editor and am still learning the protocols. I will follow the talk page procedure and further resolution if needed. Scoopczar (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- @VernoWhitney - Please comment on what I wrote at Talk:The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints#.22Mormonism_and_Christianity.22_or_.22Comparisons_within_Christianity.22_heading_and_edits concerning Original Sin. The LDS view clearly stands apart from Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant views. It does not belong in a list of shared doctrines. The LDS view of the Fall is that no sin was involved. That view is unique and bears no resemblance to any of the major streams of Christianity. Again, not saying who is right or wrong--just saying the views don't match. I would like to seek consensus to edit it out of the list or resolution if needed.
References edit
Hello Scoopczar - please ensure that any information you add or change in articles, such as John Michael Talbot contain a reliable source for verification. Thank you! --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 14:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome and the reminder. I was just intending to added the unnamed brother's name, which appears earlier in the article. However, I have now added a citation. Scoopczar (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent! Thank you and happy editing. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 15:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Sanctions edit
It's mostly a notice (a reminder, of sorts) that this particular article is frequently subject to edit wars, controversial and biased edits, etc and that administrators may impose sanctions on those that don't adhere to good editing. You should be aware of 'Article-specific editing notes' and the FAQ in the talk page. You can see a list of all articles that have the sanction notice at this page. Some other specific sanctions are at WP:General sanctions. General sanctions doesn't directly relate WP:Pending changes editing policy on that article. There are many articles with protective editing policies that aren't under general sanctions.
If there's a controversial edit you'd like to make, it's best to discuss it on the talk page first. Let me know if you have any other questions. Mahanga (Talk) 03:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012 edit
 |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Icthus edit
Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus edit
Hello,
I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library! edit
| World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Scoopczar! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Scoopczar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Scoopczar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Scoopczar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)