May 2008 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tata Group, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tata Group was changed by Sayonara1312 (u) (t) deleting 10409 characters on 2008-05-22T15:36:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Tata Group constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ——Ryan | tc 15:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC


Re: Please Help edit

Dear Ryan,

Hi! This is regarding the edit that I had made on the Tata Group page. I work in the Corporate Communications department, Tata Capital, Mumbai. The problem is this: I had uploaded the corporate profile of Tata Capital (twice: once with the username Tatacapital and the second time with the username Sayonara1312). Due to some reason, the page was rerouted to the Tata Group profile ((twice: the first time the username was not acceptable the second time the editing was reported as Vandalism by you). Now whenever someone types "Tata Capital" in Search, they view a page which mentions information on Tata Group and not on Tata Capital.

I would like to know how can I ensure that the above does not happen and on typing Tata Capital - people view the profile that I upload. I had also mentioned the Tata Group's official website - where the Tata Capital profile is uploaded. I am not very tech-savvy, so it is very possibel that I might have missed some vital process - so please guide me on the same.

I hope I hear from you soon,

Thank you and regards,

Mudita K Chaturvedi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayonara1312 (talkcontribs) 13:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looking back through the history, I can see what you're trying to do, however, when you're editing the article Tata Group, you're removing so much of the original article without providing any reliable sources to prove the notability of your editions. In fact, your edits were so excessive and so much of the original article was removed that a Bot reverted your changes. If you wish to make such editions, you must provide a source to support what you're writing. On top of that, because you said you work at the company, you need to make sure you avoid conflict of interests. If you have any more problems, drop me a line on my talk page ——Ryan | tc 14:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I did give a support - i.e, the corporate website url. is there anything else that can be done? Rgds, Mudita—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayonara1312 (talkcontribs) 13:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
The sources you provide must be from a reliable third party. If you do write or edit an article on an area in which you are personally involved, be sure to write in a neutral tone and cite reliable, third-party published sources, and beware of unintentional bias. Neutral point of view is one of Wikipedia's five pillars. If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. ——Ryan | tc 14:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply