January 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Vitamin B12 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vitamin B12. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vitamin B12 was changed by Saurabh kumar singhi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904616 on 2017-01-23T11:09:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

I think ClueBot did this because your edit messed up some of the references. I don't think your edits were vandalism though. For biomedical content on Wikipedia keep in mind it needs to follow WP:MEDRS. That is probably why your edits have faced so much resistance. Sizeofint (talk) 23:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Also made a vandalism edit to the list of fatal mountain lion attacks, claiming that the woman who was killed file promoting a female bicycle ride was male when every news article, reference, and citation notes that she was a female. This editor may be using multiple accounts and IP addresses to make that alteration since such a claim is rather rare and not a normal vandalism. SoftwareThing (talk) 14:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply