SassyKhruschev
Blocked edit
Your foolish edits aren't appreciated. If you choose to resume editing in 24 hours, please take it more seriously. Everyking (talk) 00:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Prjc
SassyKhruschev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Even though I was blocked for 24 hours due to abuse, which I apologise for, I have now been blocked indefinitely. This doesn't allow me to make useful edits, and I feel is a disproportionately large first punishment.
Decline reason:
Possibly. "I was disproportionately punished", however, doesn't actually add any credibility to your editing. As for whether or not it was disproportionate, if someone's editing history doesn't indicate they're ever going to use the ability to edit responsibly, it doesn't indicate they're ever going to need to regain that ability. - Vianello (Talk) 02:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
SassyKhruschev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I appreciate the effort put into reviewing my case, and I understand the reasons for declining. I would however like to point out that I have made a serious edit to the Chilham page, in particular the areas covered in the same benefice, which was unfortunately discredited, as I was new to Wikipedia at the time and didn't know how to properly cite sources. I would therefore like my block to be changed from indefinite to a finite length of time. I believe that my willingness to wait for a long time to use Wikipedia will show that I have genuinely good intentions, as I would get bored of waiting and lose interest if I only wanted to mess with pages.
Decline reason:
It is clear that, contrary to your claim, that you have vandalised Wikipedia articles from at least four accounts (ignoring those that were blocked before they edited). As for having made a "serious edit", the IP address you refer to made one blatant vandalism edit, reverted that edit, and then made a trivial edit which may or may not have been intended to be constructive, but even if it was, that one edit is swamped by the large number of deliberately disruptive edits, including both vandalism in articles and lies and attempts to deceive on talk pages. You will have to come up with a far better reasons if you are to convince any administrator that unblocking you will in any way benefit the encyclopaedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- As this is a checkuser block, I can't unblock you. But I can ask, "What about your other accounts?". Peridon (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Also, what do you mean by "I have made a serious edit to the Chilham page"? This account has never edited teh article Chilham. Do you mean that you edited that article using another account? If so, what account, and if not then what do you mean? JamesBWatson (talk) 13:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry for causing confusion, my edit occurred at 20:01 on the 15th November 2013, and was listed under my IP address. As for my other accounts, I've never used them, as they were blocked immediately after creation.
SassyKhruschev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay, enough is enough. I have not vandalised from "at least four accounts". Limbojazz, chilhamunited and the Artist who was formally Known as Eric Pickes are all owned by a friend. So what if we look at the same pages? That doesn't make us the same person. From atop your pretentious pedestal of self-assigned power you checkusers have started to abuse your power, much in the same way that I, to my shame, abused my account. You see a piece of highly tenuous evidence, leap to the conclusion that it is all my fault, and take some sadistic pleasure in personally insulting me and belittling me. You believe your insubstantial title makes you superior to the plebeian mass of users you think you rule over, like an omniscient, encyclopaedic deity. You are wrong. Your pompous swagger and arrogant demeanour bear testament to your insecurities, and your would-be Machiavellian malevolence only serves to demonstrate how little you really are. You dedicate your time to a crippled system, where you have gained the right to block the subservient users if you "think they may abuse in the future". This is not democracy! This totalitarian system you police has lost credibility. This is no longer an international peer-review website, open to the masses. It is exclusive, authoritarian, and it appals me. I have put this as a request to be unblocked because I want all you checkusers to read this, and realise the flaws of the society you partake in. May the modicum of decency you may still possess shine through, and may you heed the writing on the wall, before you find your Wikipedia crumbling underneath you, and your house on the sand washing away from its shaky foundations. SassyKhruschev out.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.