Welcome!


Hello, San Diablo, to Wikipedia! I'm Brookie, one of the thousands of editors at Wikipedia - I am also an Administrator. I hope you like the place and decide to stay; here are some helpful links for newcomers:

  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help pages
  Tutorial
  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...

You will get more from the site if you spend a few moments reading the above - I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions! Also tell the community a little about yourself on your User page - again, welcome to the Wiki! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...)

Mormonism edit

A christian religion is a religion following the teaching of Jesus we can find in the Bible (greek "christianos" = "the one following Christ"). Mormonism is objectively contradictory to the Bibel in countless absolutely fundamentaly questions like salvation, God, Holy Scripts and much more. There are objective reasons to delete Mormonism in all categories concerning christianity so I please you not to call this "vandalism". Thank you. Louis88 16:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocking users edit

I found that you put a (well earned) block notice on a user, but you didn't block him. Huh? I see your first edit was in March, so I guess you're not an administrator? Only admins can block users – I went ahead and did it. It doesn't really make sense to say "you're blocked" when he's not. You can request user blocks at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism or, more simply, WP:AIV. Thanks for your help fighting vandals. (You might want to look at this vandal warning toolbox.) --Kbh3rdtalk 03:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bob Saget Picture edit

Yes, that picture was disputed in the talk page, but I fixed the pic's liscence so it fits the Wikipedia fair use policy. Please put the pic back on. Josh97 15:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's not the license that was disputed, but the authenticity of the picture itself. San Diablo 15:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The dispute was wether he is a schoolteacher. There is no dought that the "Period Schedule" seen on the left is part of his comedy, and he looks and gestures like Bob Saget. Josh97 16:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
If others question the authenticity, then by definition, we do indeed have doubt. Please take your case to the talk page, rather than my own, and please remember that it falls to you to prove that the picture is genuine. San Diablo 16:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replied edit

... at my Talk page. Joie de Vivre 02:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fellatio edit

Hey, there. The conversation has "deviated" so far from the content of the Fellatio article that now might be a good time to "deviate" to editing other articles.  :) Currently the article itself is stable. Joie de Vivre T 02:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think so. At best, they're being misguided and bringing in their politics where it's not necessary. At worst, they're deliberately sabotaging Wikipedia policy. If anything, I think it's time to bring in arbitration. San Diablo 02:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Nah, I don't think it is. Right now it's mainly just bickering on the Talk page because they have an audience. If they start screwing around with articles we can bring in the fuzz. In the meantime, I think we should just leave it alone for now and see if it goes away. Joie de Vivre T 02:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply