SCopeland97

Welcome!

Hello, SCopeland97, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Amulet Hotkey page, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Amulet Hotkey page

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Amulet Hotkey page, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello SCopeland97. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SCopeland97. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SCopeland97|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. creffett (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scopeland97 (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SCopeland97/sandbox/Scopeland97 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:SCopeland97/sandbox/Scopeland97, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, SCopeland97! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Two things

I put the Paid declaration on your User page, which is where it belongs. You CAN create a draft as an employee. And then submit it to Articles for Creation, for review. IF it is accepted, going forward after that a paid editor is supposed to no longer edit the article directly, and so instead propose changes at the Talk page of the article, which another editor will either implement or decline. Second, your draft is heading toward Speedy deletion as promotional, so make sure to copy all you want to save into your Sandbox, so you can try to major change and resubmit. David notMD (talk) 19:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

An important thing

What Amulet Hotkey wants to say about itself has no place in an article. All that can be written is what other, independent people have written about AH. Words like powerful, reliable, custom solution, precise customer requirements, enterprise-class, mission-critical, commitment to quality, etc., have no place in the article. You only path toward writing neutral point of view is to act as if you have never heard of AH, and are paraphrasing what you find that others have written about the company. All that, and you might get to having your next attempt Declined rather than Speedy. David notMD (talk) 19:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation, I really appreciate it. I have a locally saved version of the article so I will work to edit out that language before I resubmit. Also, thank you for fixing the location of the PAID declaration and explaining that, I really had no idea what I was doing. SCopeland97 (talk) 18:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amulet Hotkey page (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zanimum was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amulet Hotkey page and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amulet Hotkey page, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zanimum (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Amulet Hotkey page has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amulet Hotkey page. Thanks! Zanimum (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi SCopeland97! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Confusion, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amulet Hotkey (May 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: entirely an advertisement

DGG ( talk ) 17:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:SCopeland97/sandbox/Scopeland97

Hello, SCopeland97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Scopeland97".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Amulet Hotkey

Hello, SCopeland97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amulet Hotkey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)