Rzmlvlk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Egophoricity has been accepted

Egophoricity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Rzmlvlk! I want to add a link to the article in Template:Grammatical categories, but I'm not sure where to place it. Evidentiality is somewhat randomly grouped in "Related to verbs", even though this is obviously not correct for omnipredicative languages with evidentiality marking (e.g. Tagalog or Miluk Coos), and Egophoricity might be equally misplaced there. Maybe we should introduce a category for things related to clause level marking, or just put them in "General features" next to Polarity (which similarly operates on the clause level)? Btw, great work there, also in Sino-Tibetan languages! –Austronesier (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the message! I'm inclined to agree with you although "the others" categories like "General features" might be a little bit messy (which is also the case for "Phenomena"). I don't think "semantics" will work for them either, so that would be the most suitable one. Rzmlvlk (talk) 06:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)