Ruijis

I have some research experience with gbXML, so I've made several contributions to BIM and gbXML recently, but MrOllie has reverted my edit again and again. I have checked my reference format, interest conflict, etc. If you could help with this, I would appreciate that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruijis (talk • contribs)

You say you have checked your 'interest conflict', but you keep inserting citations to yourself. - MrOllie (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

I didn't cite myself, could you tell me which one you are talking about?

You appear to be spamming gbXMLorg - you need independent sources to establish notability and suitability for inclusion. Acroterion (talk) 04:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for clarifying that. I will add some papers from the research field. By the way, what do you actually mean for independence? I found that lots of sources under BIM, gbXML, or other Wikipedia pages are commercial companies' websites, though gbXML is not like that. But I agree with you that I cite too much from gbXML org. Thanks much.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ruijis. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 04:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Causal thinking moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Causal thinking. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 23:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)