RottoKonotto, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi RottoKonotto! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. Cengiz Ertekin (August 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. Cengiz Ertekin has been accepted edit

 
R. Cengiz Ertekin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of R. Cengiz Ertekin edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on R. Cengiz Ertekin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:11, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion edit

Hi, the article was deleted because it repeatedly praised and lauded the subject in a non-neutral manner in the style of an advert. Articles should be written in a neutral manner as per WP:Neutrality. You can recreate the article, preferably for draft space and AFC review, but it will likely be deleted again if it is not written in a neutral, encyclopedic manner, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply