RosarioMendez

"I believe in everything and nothing at the same time."

Mentoring

Okay, sure. I'll drop by later to start.

The Rhymesmith 01:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Jael Strauss

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Jael Strauss, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Rebochan 15:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

MyChildren MyBride

Thank you for creating the MyChildren MyBride article. It is a good start. Could you please add a Discography section to the article, listing the band's records? Listing some of their appearances (with verifiable sources) would also be good. Thanks. Truthanado 15:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I found one album among the references and added a Discography section. Feel free to add to it. Truthanado 16:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Good job! --Rosario 07:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of MyChildren MyBride

A tag has been placed on MyChildren MyBride, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Seraphim ^Whipp 15:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I noticed your comment on the talk page so I thought I'd come here to talk. The band seem quite notable and may warrant an article, but at present the article looks liek it could be for any backyard band. Are there any news sources you could add for the page? If you can find some, feel free to remove the speedy. In fact I'll go look for some myself right now :-).

Right, I just googled before posting this message and noticed there were some sources so I'm gonna go remove the tag myself. I'll add the sources to the talk page. :-)

Seraphim ^Whipp 15:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Can't figure out where to respond to you at! Yeah, I myself do not know loads about this band, I created the article at the request of another, but I did look at their MySpace page and judging by their following there, they have to be a "something band". Those sources you added, I'll go have a read up right now and see if there's any information I can add to the article itself.

--Rosario 15:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello. I replied at my talk page and I didn't know whether you knew that so I thought I'd just let you know :). To reach my talk page, you can click on the "Whipp" part of my name and that'll take you right there :).

Seraphim ^Whipp 17:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

RE: Using the same source/reference twice or more in an article

My reply can be found here, User_talk:Seraphim_Whipp#An_explanation.2C_which_hopefully_makes_sense. :).

Seraphim ^Whipp 23:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Alba Fan Club

A tag has been placed on Alba Fan Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. --ROGER DAVIES ^TALK 14:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Nicholas Lemons

A tag has been placed on Nicholas Lemons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat 15:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Michael Crafter

Thanks for trying to help clean up this bloody article. It's so frustrating! He is notable though, I have references for the information that I've put in, but there's so much freaking vandalism everyday that it's hard to maintain. I'm not sure what the process is, but I might try to get it protected. Thanks, Electriceel [ə.lɛk.tʃɹɪk il] 02:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... I hadn't thought of that. It might be hard though, since he's associated with a few different bands, to keep the information coherent. It's for that reason, I think, that he has his own article - that he has many ties that need centralising. I agree that people shouldn't get a article just because they are in a band... otherwise every band member who's band got a shred of media attention would have their own article (!). But I do think that he's done enough, both in bands and not, to warrant him having a separate article.

That's my reasoning anyway. But I guess it doesn't shed a whole lot of light on what to do about the vandals though... I suppose that because he's changed bands so many times, people don't like him... they feel like he's abandoned them or something? I dunno. I just came across the article and decided to make it better. But what to do??? Electriceel [ə.lɛk.tʃɹɪk il] 01:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Michael Crafter

Hi, i mistook you edit to Michael Crafter as vandalism, its not but that is usually not how to revert vandalism on the wiki. You can either contact an admin or report it to WP:AIV; for more vandalism info see WP:VANDAL. Happy Editing -- (Cocoaguy ここがいい _contribs^talk) 14:51, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Well reverting is ok but the message at the top of the page is not usually used. Still keep up the good work. Happy editing -- (Cocoaguy ここがいい _contribs^talk) 14:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Eliska Amor

The image I deleted did not have a copyright tag on it. All images uploaded must contain one, this way we know its copyright status and where/if we can use it. Wizardman 14:50, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

RE:EA Vandal

No problem, I love fighting vandals. I am trying to get those pages protected at RFPP, but no one seems to be there. Thanks Marlith ^T/C 05:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Kids vandalize because all the sites they like like YouTube and MySpace are blocked by school computers. Wikipedia looks like it is academic when teachers pass by. So they can't get caught easily. Marlith ^T/C 05:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

By the way, you ought to read this discussion. Marlith ^T/C 05:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

eliska amor

very interesting to see the history of the kirsten dunst page and the leonardo dicaprio page, among others, with your own additions about how they think eliska amor is the "best actress in hollywood," "so beautiful," etc., etc. on and on, which you then delete and cite as being "gossip." what is that all about? one could find that a little suspect, eh? Clarkbizzle 07:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)clarknbizzlez

Melt the clouds of sin and sadness, drive the dark of doubt away!

Joy

Marlith ^T/C has given you a kitten! Kittens promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send kittens to others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Marlith ^T/C 05:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Andrea Bolatti

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Andrea Bolatti, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Heath Ledger

A reference you recently added to this article has been removed because it does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for a reliable source. Please note that Whodatedwho.com is a user edited site, much like Wikipedia, and should not be considered reliable. Pairadox (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RosarioMendez! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Jason Dundas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)