User talk:Robert A West/Archives/Jun2007
Could you look at something for me? edit
I don't want to sway you in one direction or the other on this topic, but could I get you to look at this, then give me your honest opinion?
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sue Rangell/B.R.I.T.T.A.N.I.C.A.
Sue Rangell[citation needed] 18:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
There has been an extensive effort to combine Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research (together with much of Wikipedia:Reliable sources) into a new policy called Wikipedia:Attribution, and its FAQ, WP:ATTFAQ.
Recently, on Wikipedia talk:Attribution and on the Wiki-EN-l mailing list, Jimbo questioned whether the result had adequate consensus, and requested:
- "a broad community discussion on this issue", (now taking place at Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion), followed by
- "a poll to assess the feelings of the community as best we can, and then we can have a final certification of the results." (now being drafted at Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll)
You are invited to take part; the community discussion should be as broad as possible. If you wish to invite other experienced and intelligent editors, please use neutral language. This message, for example, is {{ATTCD}}. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)