Welcome!

Hello, Rlg000raz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as RAZ.I.EL, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 22:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of RAZ.I.EL edit

 

The article RAZ.I.EL has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 22:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of RAZ.I.EL edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RAZ.I.EL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

In response to your feedback edit

Hi.... The great thing about Wikipedia is that anyone can edit it and create articles! If you feel that Jean Roch should have an article, you can create it! A couple of things you need to do first, though...

1. Read this page and decide if Jean Roch is notable. Are there reliable, third-party references that you can add to the article that support the inclusion of the article? If not, the article may soon be deleted.

2. Read this page that gives good instructions on how to write your first article.

Obviously, you don't have to write the article, but if you feel strongly about it, you should! If you need any help or have questions along the way, please feel free to let me know. Just click on 'Talk' after my name. Cheers!

Wikipelli Talk 12:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! Rlg000raz, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 19:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

In response to your feedback edit

Be bold and make one yourself; have a look at WP:Yourfirstarticle to learn how to do so.

Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

In response to your feedback edit

Be Bold! If you need help editing,

Ariconte (talk) 03:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

In response to your feedback edit

Hi, thanks for the edit and welcome. I just checked Nayer's page and did not find anything wrong with it. Can you be more specific on what you thought went wrong and what you wanted to do? You can respond at the Helpdesk or at my Talk page. Regards,

Pim Rijkee (talk) 05:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

In response to your feedback edit

If it was charted recently, it may be started soon. If you're interested, you may the start the page yourself. Please see Wikipedia:Your first article prior to starting articles, that page has helpful suggestions. If you have questions and/or concerns, please ask me at my talkpage.

SwisterTwister talk 00:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Ariana Grande song edit

I'm consulting with another user to see if he would approve as it seems the page has been moved several times. I will notify you what he thinks tomorrow afternoon. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Swister Twister asked me about this. Where an article has been redirected like this, you can get back to the history and the earlier versions by clicking on the name where it says "Redirected from" at the top of the page it redirects to, just under the title. There you can find the history of "Put Your Hearts Up" - it was redirected as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Put Your Hearts Up, so the person you have to convince is user Armbrust (talk), who closed the AfD - all I did was restore the redirect after an IP undid it. Give him a link to your new version. If Armbrust is not convinced, the next step is WP:Deletion review. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Put Your Hearts Up edit

This article was deleted only this afternoon after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Put Your Hearts Up (2nd nomination). You cannot simply re-create it. If you think you can overcome the reasons for deletion, you must first try to convince Arbitrarily0 (talk), the admin who closed the AfD; if he does not agree, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of I'm Alright (Jean-Roch song) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I'm Alright (Jean-Roch song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Alright (Jean-Roch song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 22:16, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

In response to your feedback edit

I'm sorry, but your new article didn't meet our policies. It will most liekly be merged with another article, not deleted.

Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Nomination for deletion of Template:Elizabeth Gillies edit

 Template:Elizabeth Gillies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jean-Roch edit

 Template:Jean-Roch has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ariana Grande edit

 Template:Ariana Grande has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -happy5214 03:40, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP:BADCHARTS edit

Please do not add the Bulgarian National Top 50 (or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS) to any Wikipedia articles. If you examine WP:GOODCHARTS, you will see that there's a valid Bulgarian chart at http://www.bamp-bg.org/en/2009-07-08-09-48-53/nmc-charts.htmlKww(talk) 04:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Rlg000raz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply