User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

OS

[1]. How dare you change your mind after I mailed you that 10 dollar bill. :-) Tiptoety ^talk 00:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

I paid him 20 to take it down ;) -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Canada at the 2012 Summer Olympics

I'm sure you're watching it anyway but I've added my ten penneth worth to Talk:Canada at the 2012 Summer Olympics#Page protected; with the Games fast approaching the quicker issues can be resolved so that updates can be made the better. Thanks - Basement12 (T.C) 23:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 03:46, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Rjd0060 (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Www.eardisley.com

Hi Rjd0060, I would like to hear your opinion on the deletion process for the above article. I tagged it for deletion under A7 (club). The tag was later removed and removed with the {{newpage}} which asserts that the user is aware of the notability criteria. However, it is relatively clear that the new user is not familiar with the notability criteria. In this situation would it be appropriate to restore the speedy deletion template? -CTS talk 04:38, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Except for obvious cases for deletion, speedy tags (once removed) shouldn't be re-added. Not a rule, but general practice. You might want to go to AFD for this one though. Rjd0060 (talk) 05:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

But keeping in mind that it was removed by the creator, I think that it should be appropriate to send it through the normal CSD process. -CTS talk 05:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

My mistake. You're right, I deleted the article (again - it was already a7'd earlier). Thanks! Rjd0060 (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

The video I added to "Trade"

Hey Rjd, I don't have a conflict of interest regarding this topic and I don't mention myself or any businesses I'm involved in. However I do think the content is helpful and that wikipedia is very light on good video content so I wanted to share this video. I'm new to making contributions to wikipeida though so I could use some help. Do you think the video is helpful? If so, what is the best way to add it? Any help is greatly appreciated as I really do care about the topic and spent a lot of time creating a video that I thought was helpful.

-Jack JackCouch101 (talk) 04:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

BLPPROD

I noticed that you proposed for deletion as the unreferenced biography of a living person someone who his biography described as president of the IRB from 1907 to 1910. PatGallacher (talk) 09:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes...Are you just making an observation or did you have some sort of inquiry about it? Rjd0060 (talk) 17:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

MetricStream Page

I guess the Metricstream company page is deleted by mistake. Could you please restore it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.251.15.178 (talk) 04:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

It was no mistake. It was deleted for the reason listed in the deletion log. In this case, the reason for deletion was "Effectively unsourced since creation. No improvement since tagged in Sept, and no sources of significant depth found in search." There were also references in the deletion to a Wikipedia inclusion guideline, WP:NCORP. In accordance with the proposed deletion policy, the article may be restored upon any reasonable request however I would be hesitant to restore this one without knowing somebody was going to work on improving the content so it is more suitable with Wikipedia guidelines. Rjd0060 (talk) 05:01, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

MetricStream is covered vastly by reliable and independent secondary sources like Gartner, Forrester and other research agencies.3 Let me know if you need any supporting articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.251.15.178 (talk) 05:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

If you search with the keywords "shellye archambeau new york times" it will show our CEO's interview in the media. Also, we will continue to improve the content in the page adhering to wiki guidelines - Jude, MetricStream

1 edit edit war. Amazing.

Erm.

I made 1 edit.

Started a discussion on the talk page after the one (1... singular) wp:BRD edit was reverted. Noticed that this was pointless. Dropped the article from my watch list.

Did you actually review that before you posted to my talk page? If you did, study more on the reading thing. If not, please do before posterizing up. God I despise this community. But the only way to work in this very important project is to put up with this nonsense.

Toodles.

I have removed your pointless and incorrect statement from my talk page.

User talk:Unfriend12 02:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Twinkle

I noticed your edits to the Twinkle gadget file. I agree that the grammar there was poor and needed fixing, and thank you for making the change.

However, please take heed of the notice at the top of the gadget file: any manual edits will be overwritten by our update script when it next runs. Luckily I noticed this change and have incorporated it into our master repository at https://github.com/azatoth/twinkle. However, in future, to avoid losing any future modifications to the Twinkle code, please either notify us by posting at WT:TW or filing an issue at the above-mentioned GitHub site. Thanks, — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Also, while I'm looking at deprod, I notice the deletion summary at Mohammad Reza Ghorbani and Sqoop, among others, got borked. Do you think you could restore those pages (with history) into my userspace so I can check them out? Thanks, — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

urgent: 82.132.244.13

I request that this IP is to be blocked due to harassment towards me on EggCentric's talk page. Thanks Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud (talk) 16:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Is that the right IP? I don't see any contributions. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:57, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Rollback Rights

Thank you for granting me rollback right. I will keep your directions in mind and use it only where vandalism can be clearly identified.--Vyom25 (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Please restore these images

• File:Lili-Rochefort.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• File:Jin-Kazama.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• File:Johnnycage-render.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• File:Ling-Xiaoyu.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• File:Alisa-Bosconovitch.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• File:Kano-render.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(already restored were File:Christie-Monteiro.png, File:Kazuya-mishima.png, and File:Anna-williams.png) This was not eligible for immediate speedy deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Feel free to restore them, however they do need to be re-uploaded in a low-res version, to comply with WP:NFCC. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:43, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Y Done Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:07, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Joe Kearns Goodwin

Hello, You recently deleted an uncontested PROD of the article Joseph Kearns Goodwin. My friend, the creator, complained that the article had been deleted, and I, a mostly-retired Wikipedian, decided to help her out. I found references to confirm that the subject meets the general notability guideline (it is true that they do not (yet) meet the WP:POLITICIAN guideline, but that's irrelevant), and I added those references, in addition to making some edits. While Goodwin does not necessarily meet WP:POLITICIAN, he clearly meets WP:GNG. I understand the desire to delete poorly formatted pages, but I believe that wikipedia as a community should work to avoid deleting pages where a simple Google News search would have proved that the subject meets the guideline. This would be extremely helpful to the public image of the site. I have created the article at Joe Kearns Goodwin, and I will create a redirect from the other page. Please feel free to reply on my talk page with any questions or concerns. Regards, ^~Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎ 05:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I agree that it's an old argument, it's just a pet peeve of mine. It's one of the many reasons that I left. ^~Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎ 05:15, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Jozef Cieminski

I think I understand correctly why my article on Rev. Cieminski was deleted. As written, it did not sufficiently explain his significance. Hopefully it was just a matter of my article's not being fully ready for publication to Wikipedia. If you wouldn't mind taking a quick look at the first part of my blog article on Rev. Cieminski, I would be very appreciative of your opinion on whether I should reattempt the article or not.

Thanks, Joe

Kaszubian (talk) 13:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

2012 FIVB etc etc

Hi, I am just making some small edits to the controversy section on the page protected (not removing any info) - some of the wording is truely terrible. I know it was the subject of a revert/blanking war, but the people involved should have taken the five minutes to look at it. If you have any issues with my changes let me know. Only in death does duty end (talk) 11:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Possible OR violation from user

GreatLifeInService may have recently posted OR. The citation the user provided was the same as the one in the following sentence. The source did not state what the user posted. I have left comments on the user's talk page. Zepppep (talk) 02:40, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Please revoke talk page access

Please revoke talk page access to User:Frozeneyez‎ immediately.Cheers TheStrikeΣagle 11:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! TheStrikeΣagle 11:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Restore request

Could you please move the Mysticum article to my sandbox? The band’s notability can be shown through several notable labels (album released through Full Moon Productions, contributions to a Necropolis Records compilation, contract with Peaceville Records) and the list from Rock Hard no. 269. And since you once deleted the article, I would be grateful for your feedback once I have re-written it. --217/83 12:26, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done. I have moved it to User:H. 217.83/MysticumMysticum by mistake - feel free to fix that to your liking. :) Rjd0060 (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Please revoke talk page access (#2)

Hi Rjd0060, could you please revoke talk page access for 75.72.164.60? They added "Poop your pants!" to their talk page. I reverted, and then they undid my edit. Thanks, David1217 ^{What I've done} 04:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for answering my question and removing File:Jccc-logo.png for me. Its great to know that Admins watch the WP General IRC Channels in case a user needs help. Keep up the great work! :) Dillard421♂♂ (talk to me) 17:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Rjd0060. You have new messages at Zeeyanketu's talk page.
Message added 20:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

It would be good if protection template be seen on my user page 42.108.157.26 (talk) 20:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanx a ton enjoy! ---zeeyanketu talk to me 20:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Carmelo Caruana

Hi. Why did you speedily delete an article whose deletion was contested? That AfD was open all of 30 minutes. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Rjd0060. You have new messages at A. B.'s talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for the help! Pine✉ 05:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

TechCrunch Disrupt

Hello Rjd0060. Today, I searched for TechCrunch Disrupt on Wikipedia and I was surprised not to find it here, given the media attention. I've re-created the redirect to TechCrunch, but I'd like to restore and improve the article that you deleted in July. Do you have any objections? Thanks. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

282 MEP

You deleted the above article that I created, and now I am unable to see my original contribution. Ref:

• 17:58, 6 March 2012 Rjd0060 (Talk | contribs) deleted page 282 MEP (Deleted because expired WP:PROD; Reason given: . )

I understand that there was a request for more references and I uncovered both old and new DIN data, per:

• old DIN: 00108316 (Frosst > Merck Canada)
• new DIN: 02238646 (Pendopharm)

The license to manufacture this drug was transferred to Pendopharm, Montreal, Quebec 2006-10-20 or 1998-08-14 (discontinued by Merck). However, the 282 MEP links on the Pendopharm website were deleted a few days after I posted it. This prescription drug is still available, although it is presently unclear if Pendopharm is still the current licensee.

If it is possible to recover my original contribution, I can try to find current references. Otherwise, I may not bother since it is discouraging to have to repeat an earlier effort. Enquire (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for getting that OTRS ticket

Thanks for unblocking that jpmanoux account. I felt kinda bad for the guy. I'm glad it got cleared up. --Jayron32 03:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

AfC Deletion =

What was the copyright infringement on this article you deleted? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/David_Nelson_Rose Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeRoscoeRudd (talk • contribs) 19:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Here is the notice that was on the page prior to it being deleted:

"This submission appears to be taken from http://modagraphik.com/?cat=11. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. We cannot accept copyrighted content taken from websites or printed sources. Note that copyright protection is granted to all works automatically, whether it is asserted or not. Unless stated otherwise, assume that most content on the internet is copyrighted and not suitable for publishing on Wikipedia. Copyrighted content can be cited as a reliable source if it meets Wikipedia's guidelines; however, your submission must be written in your own words, and in continuous prose."

Hope this helps. Also, please sign your talk page posts by adding ~~~~ to the end of your posts. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:22, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Village pump discussion

Hi. Awhile ago you created the GlobalBlocking policy. I've suggested merging it to the normal blocking policy at the VP and thought you should be aware. See this thread. NTox · talk 01:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Nicolas Kent

Hello, I'd like to create a new article about theatre director Nicolas Kent. As the artistic director of London's Tricycle Theatre for nearly 30 years, he merits an article. He has done important work in political theatre. Any objection to my starting and working on a properly reference article? --Agarpp (talk) 13:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit request

Do you think you could answer my edit request since it doesn't seem to receive any objections?—cyberpower _{Limited Access}^{Trick or Treat} 12:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Apple Inc.

Hello, can you restore the indefinite move-sysop protection to the page Apple Inc.? I thik you removed it by mistake. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:07, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Delete question =

hi, sorry I really don't understand why motion ninja is deleted, since there are more than five reference links is proved, also I will show you more. Eng: http://www.appsontapp.com/motion-ninja/

    http://appshopper.com/games/motion-ninja

other languages: http://iphone.tgbus.com/newgame/yizhi/201211/20121120131201.shtml

               ios.feixue.com/game/26631.html

thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wz1900 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Risa Vetri Ferman

Why did you delete the entry for Risa Ferman? She is the district attorney for Montgomery County PA, one of the largest communities in PA? Please let me know hat we can do to get this reinstated ASAP. I can be reached at <removed>. Thank you. 173.12.17.21 (talk) 01:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Please respond. Its been a few days since I posted this request with no reply and I need to try and resolve this issue quickly. Thank you

Chehelsotoon, Qazvin

Why was this deleted? The resources provided are not enough? Instead, you could clean up the article requested resource.You're asking for deletion. The call for papers wiki violates the rules, not articles with less resources.Do Municipal Website Qazvin, Iran is not a good source?Omid hendupur (talk) 11:47, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi mate, saw you deleted Kellie madison. Thanks for that. Any chance you could delete Talk:Kellie madison also? Cheers, Stalwart111 12:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done - someone got it. All good. Cheers, Stalwart111 13:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Pfunc expr unexpected operator

Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#MediaWiki:Pfunc_expr_unexpected_operator, as you made these changes in 2009. --— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 10:30, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Link fixed Legoktm (talk) 10:44, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Backlinks after deletion

Hi, I noticed that you deleted Will (Maria Boyd novel), but did not delete the backlinks from other pages Will or Will (novel). (See Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion#Deletion.) If you normally do these steps but overlooked them on that occasion, please excuse my note; otherwise, I hope this is a helpful reminder. Best wishes for 2013 – Fayenatic London 09:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Never had that happen before

It looks like we protected User talk:Webclient101 at the same time [2]. I feel a week is excessive for a user talk page, but I won't change your protection. bibliomaniac15 00:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Cloud Security Alliance

I saw you deleted this for regular maintenance? But it was in the queue for review, with significant updates and numerous external citations. Please reinstate, or provide suggestions for improving the page. Thanks. Xena77 (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Xena77

Appreciate your feedback. Is it possible for you to repost as draft so I can edit? Thanks. Xena77 (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Xena77

Deleted my film page Udhao

Hi I worked several days figuring out how wikipedia works to develop the article for my film Udhao. I am the director Amit Ashraf, and all the content belongs to me. I am very curious to way it was deleted. I am a little sad because I worked hard, and I am new to the formatting. Is it still saved somewhere? Can you please assist me? I am used Udhao Movie. unsigned 07:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Danger tagged the AfC page for deletion as a copyright violation. Rjd0060 (talk) 07:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok I think I know why. I copied our story from our facebook page. Its not infringement, because it is both my writing. I will write a new story in new words. Can you please reinstate so i can change. I spent a lot of time working on it, and I really would be frustrated if I had to do it again. Everything else is new content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.247.162.26 (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Please contact Danger, at User talk:Danger. Also, please sign your talk page messages by adding 4 tildes (~~~~ after your comment. Thanks! Rjd0060 (talk) 05:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

OTRS question

Hi, I was looking at WP:OTRS, and had a question. What kind of backlog do we usually have (or currently have) in it?

I was reviewing Shannon T. Boodram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), and noticed that the image in it was uploaded on January 1st with a comment "The license agreement will be forwarded to OTRS shortly." However, the user that uploaded the image is now blocked as a sockpuppet, which forced me to question the legitimacy of such a ticket ever having been submitted. Is the backlog sufficient that this could still be in the queue; or if no such ticket exists, should the image be sent the way of the copyvio disposal system? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

I think I located the answer to my own question ... after checking a sample of images in Category:Items pending OTRS confirmation of permission for over 30 days, I found some with no edits since July 2012 still awaiting either Wikipedia:OTRS confirmation or deletion. So, appears to be a sizable backlog. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Request: Can you add a header message to a specific feedback page

Hello, I was wondering if a header message could be added to the Article Feedback page for the Sandy Hook shootings. More specifically, a message about looking at this link before discussing anything about guns due to a msnbc.com video floating around. Thank you for your time in reading this. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Would you consider reviewing my page before publication?

Revised CSA page to include only publicly available references: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xena77/Cloud_security_alliance Would really appreciate any feedback. Thanks! Xena77 (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Xena77

OTRS Retention

I'm sympathetic to the need to recruit new users to OTRS but I wondered if you guys have considered the impact of poor communication from the OTRS admins on existing OTRS volunteers. If you are not sure what I'm about, look at ticket 2011120510017359. I resigned from OTRS because you (the OTRS admins) wouldn't engage with what turned out to be well founded concerns about a particular user. Just a thought for you to ponder on. I'd send you an email but obviously my experience with you taking them seriously is pretty limited. At least this way I'll know you got the message. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I'll first say that this ticket was the first I've seen of the whole "situation" that it refers to. I was inactive for a while, and just came back to OTRS mid-late 2012. On the general subject of communication, however, yes ... this is something we're working to improve. Not sure if you're familiar with some recent discussion on Meta, but it yielded a number of changes both internally and on the 'public' side of things. And we're constantly working to continue this move towards appropriate communication and transparency. If you have any specific suggestions we're always open to hearing them. Thanks. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:04, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, simple suggestion, don't ignore your hard working and reliable users when they have genuine issues of concern. Bit late for me, but with falling admin numbers and few good candidates coming through you can't afford to lose any more good volunteers with this kind of stonewalling. I raised the lack of communication with the foundation as well but they couldn't even be bothered to acknowledge the email. Any wonder people don't want to be associated with this place? Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you're referring to an issue that happened in December, 2011 - so it's not quite right if you're insinuating that nothing has changed in the year since then. But as I've said, our "doors" are always open, and we've been working (and showing progress) on a number of related issues. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:08, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm not insinuating anything Rjd, I'm providing feedback. You asked for my suggestions and I commented on the issue that made me give up OTRS activity so I don't understand why you need to be so snarky back. It does rather belie your statements that you are open to hearing suggestions, which doesn't exactly auger well for being more communicative and listening does it? Spartaz ^Humbug! 02:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Snarky? Well, I'd disagree. Anyhow, as I've pointed out, your concerns pointed out are related to issues from over a year ago so I assure you that such issue has been resolved. Thank you for your feedback. Rjd0060 (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi Spartaz. What you said about poor communication from OTRS admins may have been true in the past, and indeed there were some public complaints from agents themselves about some of the recent actions of admins (see m:Talk:OTRS/Volunteering#"Comments" on prospective OTRS helpers for the discussion). To that end, the admins made a statement about increasing transparency and accountability. I know actions speak louder than words and whilst I'm not an OTRS admin myself, I've been working on a complete overhaul of the pages on Meta-Wiki (and to some extent OTRS wiki). You can see what I've been working on at with a couple of the OTRS admins at m:OTRS/Cleanup - a small step to increasing this communication is the addition of extra details at m:OTRS#OTRS administrators. There's also been a rewording of all of the pages that a prospective volunteer or interested user would see to clarify what OTRS does and who to contact if you have any problems. I'd appreciate any input you have on how to improve any of the pages that are being worked on here, on my Meta talk page or feel free to just boldly edit m:OTRS/Cleanup too. Thanks! Thehelpfulone 21:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't mean to be unhelpful but since you don't have access to the emails/issue underlaying this I'm not entirely sure how helpful your intervention is because it doesn't in anyway touch on the issue that upset me. Spartaz ^Humbug! 02:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Is there a minimum OTRS activity level required?

Hi, I saw your plea for more OTRS volunteers at WP:BLPN, and thought I'd volunteer, but I wonder if there is a minimum level of activity needed? I've been a Wikipedian for many years now, but I have inactive periods, I can't guarantee being available every day. If I would be able to take the occasional ticket when I'm available (and follow it through to the end) I'd love to help. --GRuban (talk) 14:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

While there are no activity requirements per se, accounts that are long inactive are closed as we don't just want open access if it isn't being used. :-) You're not required to do any amount of work though. One email or a hundred emails ... every reply is helpful! Rjd0060 (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

"long" means a month or a year? I don't think I've ever gone a year without wiki work, but I might have missed a month once or twice... All right, will volunteer. --GRuban (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! So, what's the next step? Should I get email, talk on En, or talk on Meta? Or is there some other page of instructions I should be reading and following? --GRuban (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

I mentioned one of your user subpages...

In case your ears are burning, I liked the look of DAL so much that I lovingly ripped it off copied the format and coding (providing proper attribution in the edit summary) to create User:Bencherlite/TFA notepad/TFAs and POTDs, then mentioned both pages at WT:TFAR. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 19:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Nikoloz Pirtskhalava

I just wanted to point out that when you deleted this page you missed the talk page. Cheers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Restricted-use media list

An RfC that may interest you has been opened at MediaWiki talk:Bad image list#Restricted-use media list, so please come and include your opinion. – PAINE ELLSWORTH ^CLIMAX! 10:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Code fix

I think you might have made a minor mistake in the code when you put the protection template on the page for the Spanish Civil War. The infobox is appearing in the wrong place on the page. I have no idea what that mistake might be, however.
LoveWaffle (talk) 05:40, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Phildel

The article for Phildel has previously been deleted, but since she has now released a full album, and is thus a notable musician, I would like to recreate the article or start a new one. Quacksecho (talk) 10:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Restore request

As an administrator, you can move articles without creating a redirect. Could you do that with the Mysticum article? You moved that one to User:H. 217.83/MysticumMysticum by mistake (see my talk page), and although it could still be improved, it is more or less ready. And I would like you to move the deleted Hell Militia article to User:H. 217.83/sandbox so I can show their notability. --217/83 15:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC) I asked you one month ago. --217/83 08:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Please contact another administrator about this issue. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for your reply. --217/83 07:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Why did you delete the NORTH SOUTH DIVIDED RADIO SHOW ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.170.115.134 (talk) 22:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

References

Can you please direct me to where I should report references abuse. The warning I placed on the IPs page said they could be blocked if they continued to add unsourced information (which they did), but it seems the appropriate noticeboard is simply for questions relating to sources. Can you assist? Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 03:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I believe you may have users "investigated" at the RS/N as well. If it continues to be a persistent problem after else fails, WP:AN? I'm limited in activity on en.wiki, presently. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Eva Pierrakos article

I am wondering why you decided to delete the article on Eva Pierrakos, considering her "not notable." I object to this determination. Eva Pierrakos was the founder of the Pathwork, an internationally known spiritual path, with some 10,000 adherents worldwide. She was the daughter of a famous Austrian novelist, Jakob Wasserman, and the husband of the son of another famed German novelist, Hermann Broch. The Pathwork itself is remarkable for being a marriage of Eastern philosophy and Western psychology. I note that there are very many wikipedia pages on people who have had much less influence on people and society. How can wikipedia create a page on, say, Daft Punk, which is just a couple of guys who have cut some records? Hmmm

Thank you for your response,

Alan Saly Alan Saly (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

I deleted it, as it says in the deletion log right next to the part you copied here, in accordance with WP:PROD. I have, nor ever had, any opinion on the article. Also, another admin has deleted article twice since, so you'd need to discuss with them. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Jarren Benton article

Why is the article deleted? His music videos has millions of views on Youtube. He's signed to Funk Volume and his new album will be released june 11th. Christian G (talk) 12:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

The article isn't deleted. An old version was, but that one was not up to quality standards. Read the current article, perhaps. Click -->Jarren Benton Rjd0060 (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Malaysia Airlines logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Malaysia Airlines logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 00:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:Expand article

It is now a redirect to template:expand. Shall it be unprotected along with template:expand further, or will it still be protected but at lower protection level? --George Ho (talk) 17:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

The Original Surfaris

I intend to restore the article on the eponymous band. They're considered one of the seminal surf bands of the 1960s, scoring a number of national and local hits. If you have any objections as far as their notability is concerned, please let me know; I'd like to address them. -The Gnome (talk) 05:02, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

You might be interested in looking up the new entry here. Cheers, The Gnome (talk) 10:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Deleted article Braminar

Some five years ago you deleted this article, saying it wasn't "notable" enough. Is there any way of restoring or otherwise reading the text of the deleted article? I'm writing an article about text based games from the 80s and the information on that page would have been very valuable to me right now. I feel a certain sense of irony here, that I'm trying to make a record of something to ensure it's preserved for future generations, while people in charge of maintaining such an archive, are actively deleting it. We may not know the names of those who burnt down the Library of Alexandria, we'll never even know the extent of what it once contained, but preserved for eternity will be the name Rjd0060. They deleted the article you needed. 174.0.70.87 (talk) 17:25, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Deleted Article Dennis Grant

This article was deleted in March. The subject of the article was the first Canadian to win an SCCA ProSolo National Championship, and was a professional race car driver. Sure, ProSolo may not seem like much next to Formula 1, but it is still a nation-wide, international race series run by one of the major American racing organizations. The article will be restored. If you have objections, please make them known on the Talk page rather than deleting the article summarily. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.221.21 (talk) 09:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I was just coming over here to let you know that the article, which you performed the administrative deletion of in march, had resurfaced, and to inform you of the AfD discussion when I saw the comment above. You may wish to weigh the comment above against the previous PROD reason and contribute to the discussion. I have no intention of seeking to influence your input. Fiddle Faddle 10:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

More vandalism from IP

Thanks for blocking this IP for 31 hours. Soon after the block expired, the IP vandalized again.[3] Maybe a longer block? Thanks. TimidGuy (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Re-blocked. Thank you. :) Rjd0060 (talk) 02:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! TimidGuy (talk) 17:49, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Oops

I saw VRTS ticket #  and missed that you had already responded.

I had composed a draft response:

I understand why the attempts to remove the address were reverted. However, I opened a discussion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Request_to_remove_an_address

where a consensus of editors will weigh in. I think it is likely there will be an agreement to remove it If that doesn't occur, we can discuss next steps.

However, the ticket is locked. Would you be willing to either send a note indicating the discussion I opened, or unlock it so I can? Sorry for intruding, I don't like to step on someone else's toes, and I don't unless the prior responses are quite old, I simply saw the email, and went to the article in question and started responding before realizing you were the owner.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:03, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

It's all yours. :-) Rjd0060 (talk) 22:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your assistance please

I am watching Errol Morris's documentary on Joyce McKinney. I see that you deleted an article on this individual in 2008. Your deletion log entry merely says "(blp)".

Was there a discussion over whether this individual merited a stand-alone article? If so could you direct me to that discussion?

McKinney is the subject of several books, and a feature length documentary. It could be argued that the extensive press coverage, these books, the documentary, would be enough to establish her wikipedia notability. I'd like to see whether that argument was made in the deletion discussion, and I would like to read whatever counter-arguments were offered, to see if I found them convincing.

A year later another administrator made Joyce McKinney a redirect, and protected it from editing -- presumably out of respect for the original reasoning that you relied on when you deleted the original article.

If there was no discussion, if you deleted the article in response to a speedy tag, or on your sole judgment, what steps do you think would be in order to unprotect it? Geo Swan (talk) 12:31, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Eddie Alderson

Hey, I noticed that you deleted Eddie Alderson. I was wondering where I can find the deletion log on him, to see the reasons why this page has been deleted? Thanks in advance!  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 12:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

It was deleted in accordance with the Proposed Deletion policy, after an editor believed the article did not meet Wikipedia's guidelines on notability, specifically stating "Has only one major acting role, no evidence of WP:NACTOR or WP:ANYBIO". I simply acted on the request after it remained un-disputed for a 5 day period. I have no personal opinion on the matter. Rjd0060 (talk) 11:33, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, but I want to see where is the log on him, for example Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 August 25.  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 12:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

There is no "log" other than the deletion log, which you must have saw, as that's how you found out it was me who deleted the article. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

I understand I just want to see the page where this editor specifically stated "Has only one major acting role″ for example the page that I showed you above. It must have one.  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 02:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

No, it does not have one. That is not how the proposed deletion procedure works. Please review WP:PROD. That should answer the questions. Proposed Deletions do not require a "discussion". Rjd0060 (talk) 11:47, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I am curious why it was deleted? The page Eddie Alderson. If the conflict has been resolved, or happened too long ago, then it is good to disregard this comment. Speling12345 (talk) 5:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Country data Habsburg Monarchy

Hello
I just wanted to call your attention to the unanswered edit request on Template talk:Country data Habsburg Monarchy. It has been unanswered for some time already and the change is necessary. Would you mind having a look at it? (since you are an administrator)
Thanks King Philip V of Spain (talk) 05:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Template protection request

As the original protecting editor, please see this protection reduction request. Debresser (talk) 02:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the courtesy note, Debresser. Apparently Mark Arsten found it not necessary to ask for more information so ... yeah. Thanks anyways. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I usually remember to ask but it slipped my mind the other day for some reason. Feel free to revert me if it needs to be changed. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Replied

Wasn't sure to reply here too, but just doing it here. I wanted to chat with some people on here about sociology, but also about fun stuff. Im going to eat breakfast now, but I'll be back in the afternoon probably, but its nice to meet you! 174.19.163.225 (talk) 18:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Italian language protected

Hi, On the page Italian language, please tag the page with a protection template. Thanks! Thewikiguru1 (talk) 21:12, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

I thought a bot did that now. Anyways, done. :-) Rjd0060 (talk) 00:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Brian Treanor

Ryan.

I'm updating some pages (environmental virtue ethics) as well as creating some new ones (environmental hermeneutics, martin drenthen, and others to come) in order to flesh out wikipedia's content on these developing fields. In the course of doing so I was going to update/revive the page on "Brian Treanor," which you deleted some time ago due to notability issues. The person in question currently holds a named chair at a university (the Taylor Chair of Philosophy) and, in addition, has work cited in a number of third party books and articles, which seems to meet the criteria at this point. Comparing to a number of other pages, this seems sufficient, but I'm interested in your thoughts. Other pages I hope to develop or flesh out include links for organizations (International Association for Environmental Philosophy, International Society for Environmental Ethics), and scholars (David Wood, Ted Toadvine, and others). Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wordsmyth123 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

voting

voting is good? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.35.24.48 (talk) 04:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Edit on a protected page

Hello Ryan
I just wanted to call your attention to a very important issue on the talk page of Template:Country data Habsburg Monarchy. There is an important edit request that has gone unanswered for quite some time. Could you check that, since only administrators can edit that page? Thanks King Philip V of Spain (talk) 04:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Request for UnDeletion

Hi, I would like to request that the page Postano be undeleted. I have created some content on my personal bio to replace the deleted page that has suitable content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.187.105.34 (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HIFK hockey.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HIFK hockey.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Discussion on Jimmy's talk page

Hi. Jimmy has opened a discussion at User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 164#Philosophical discussion of hypothetical BLP situation and some have suggested OTRS could play a role in one or more of the proposals. Would you be interested in commenting? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 08:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

VANDAISMS BAD

Seriously its bad. lololol71.35.21.213 (talk) 02:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Request to undelete "The Marching Virginians"

It was citied as being deleted for lack of 3rd party sources when in reality it has just as many sources as many other college marching bands. In fact a quick look at the "Highty-Tighties" page (Cadet band at VT) reveals they have fewer independent citations. The Marching Virginians (MVs) are highly active in the Blacksburg community and a large part of the sports traditions at Virginia Tech. Many of the traditions that were in the article are passed down within the group and thus have no citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skanetic (talk • contribs) 00:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

This article was already deleted (and subsequently AFD'd by another admin. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Request to undelete "Pandey Narmedeshwor Sahay, Renowned Bhojpuri Poet"

It has been deleted because of no reference provided. I now have references which I can link to this article to make it credible. However, I need to know how to add those and also these references are screen shot taken from published magazines and Newspaper cutout. Kindly suggest as how to progress and reinstate this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmirch38 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

I've restored the article and re-proposed its deletion as it is an unsourced biography. There is now a 1-week period that sources must be added to avoid the re-deletion of the article. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Moon Seon-min

I was about to remove the Prod for Moon Seon-min as he appears to meet WP:GNG with a lot of media coverage, but you deleted it while I was still researching it.

Can you restore it? Thanks Nfitz (talk) 02:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done Rjd0060 (talk) 02:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Emiliano Tade

Another one I'm afraid. Can you restore the prodded Emiliano Tade. Not sure how the top scorer in last year's Champions League wouldn't have achieved WP:GNG. Nfitz (talk) 03:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done Rjd0060 (talk) 04:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Gullringens GoIF

Can you unprod Gullringens GoIF and Svalövs BK as well. At a minimum they should be redirected to Swedish Football Division 3 or Swedish Football Division 4 - though as almost all Division 3 and many Division 4 teams have articles, and the articles all seem well referenced, one has to wonder about WP:GNG and cup play. Nfitz (talk) 03:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Both  Done. Rjd0060 (talk) 04:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Pandey Narmedeshwor Sahay, Renowned Bhojpuri Poet

Hi,

I removed the BLPPROD from Pandey Narmedeshwor Sahay, Renowned Bhojpuri Poet, since the article says he is dead. The WP:BLPPROD policy says that it is intended only to apply to "actual biographies of living people", and that in cases where there is any doubt of its applicability, another deletion policy should be used. I've always taken that to mean that if the article says the person is dead, BLPPROD should not be used. Since a prod was also previously contested, please take the article to AFD if you think it should be deleted. I agree that the article has problems since it is unsourced and the main contributor might have a conflict of interest, but it still needs to go to AFD to be deleted since that is the only deletion policy that is applicable. Also, it looks like you previously restored the article but forgot to restore the talk page. Since the article currently exists, the talk page should also probably be restored. Thanks. Calathan (talk) 15:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

I am aware of the BLPPROD policy. I overlooked the fact that the person was no longer living and just saw an article that is definitely not up to our standards. I don't care if the article stays or goes. At all. I was only carrying out the maintenance task of deletion per the request of whoever added the PROD and trying to ensure all biographies are sourced. I've restored the talk page as well. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Guilherme de Jesus da Silva

And another Guilherme de Jesus da Silva who has 3 appearances last season for Gremio in the top Brazilian league, easily meeting WP:NFOOTBALL. Is no one else looking at these prods? Nfitz (talk) 05:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

• And Tiago Machowski of the same team, who had one professional appearance last year according to [4] Nfitz (talk) 05:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
• And Guilherme Amorim of the same team, who had 3 starts last season. This is getting bizarre ... Nfitz (talk) 05:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
• And Felipe Guedes of the same team and another, who has had 20 fully-professional appearances in the last 3 seasons. Nfitz (talk) 05:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
• And Matheus Barbosa who had 2 appearances last season ... Nfitz (talk) 05:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Ah ... hold on. I've goofed, and I've mistaken Campeonato Gaúcho Série A1 for Campeonato Brasileiro Série A. (the top state league vs the top federal league). So please leave they way they are. Thanks, Nfitz (talk) 15:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Let me know. And if you reviewed the articles prior to deletion (which I don't know if you did or not) is there a reason you left the PROD tags on? Rjd0060 (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks. It's my mistake. I thought they'd played in the top national league, not the top state league, so the prods make sense. I didn't review the prods before deletion. I only tend to pop in every week or so, and there were a whole pile of articles that were deleted just as I started looking through the recent prods. Nfitz (talk) 03:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Ralph Sarchie

Hello Rjd0060, I would like to dispute the PROD that was placed on Ralph Sarchie. I believe from what I saw from the article that if it was to be deleted, it should have been via AfD as he seemed to meet the WP:GNG.STATic message me! 18:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Restored per policy. Next time you see a PROD'ed article that does not meet PROD deletion guidelines, remove the tag. If nobody disputes deletion it will be deleted otherwise. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

I had not watchlisted the page when I first viewed it, so I did not know it had ever been PROD'ed. STATic message me! 00:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

OTRS

Hey Ryan, I noticed you took my name off the volunteer list, I was just wondering where my application stands at this point. I haven't seen an email or a message anywhere about the status. Thank you cliffsteinman -- Discuss 17:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Cliffsteinman. I did reply to you yesterday. I've resent the email. If you still have not received it let me know (as that would be very strange!). Thanks for the note. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

David Karp

Could you semi David Karp temporarily? Persistent vandalism. Cant keep up with the edits. Thanks!  NQ  talk 00:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Done! I've also blocked an account or two that clearly aren't here to contribute. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:16, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

That was quick! Appreciate it.  NQ  talk 00:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Rjd0060. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 01:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Rjd0060. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 01:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"Dropping the issue?"

Does this count as "dropping the issue"? Quis separabit? 16:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Fisheries Centre

You recently deleted the UBC Fisheries Centre, which someone unfortunately prodded. This centre is one of the most influential fisheries research centres in the world. It is the parent organisation for a number of research tools and units, some of which (Ecopath, Sea Around Us Project and Project Seahorse) already have Wikipedia articles, and is part of the FishBase Consortium. Would you please place a copy of the deleted article in my user space so I can expand it and return it to article space. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 02:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. I've moved it to User:Epipelagic/Fisheries Centre. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:35, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

"Dropping the issue?"

Does this count as "dropping the issue"? Quis separabit? 16:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Fisheries Centre

You recently deleted the UBC Fisheries Centre, which someone unfortunately prodded. This centre is one of the most influential fisheries research centres in the world. It is the parent organisation for a number of research tools and units, some of which (Ecopath, Sea Around Us Project and Project Seahorse) already have Wikipedia articles, and is part of the FishBase Consortium. Would you please place a copy of the deleted article in my user space so I can expand it and return it to article space. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 02:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. I've moved it to User:Epipelagic/Fisheries Centre. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:35, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

CAMBRA

You recently deleted the article on CAMBRA, an acronym describing an alternative form of preventative dentistry that has peer reviewed research supporting it's effectiveness. The article was created to proved a jumping off point for people to contribute to the topic. It should be reinstated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewfer5 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Drewfer5. I've restored the article however I strongly encourage you to improve it if you can. It does not appear to meet Wikipedia's quality standards at the present moment. I would not be surprised if somebody begins a deletion discussion on this. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Gene Abel

I would be grateful if you would at least review your recent deletion of Gene Abel - so far as I can judge (for reasons explained at more length at WP:Articles for deletion/Abel Assessment), the WP:PRODder had ulterior motives, and a GScholar search fairly clearly shows the subject as meeting WP:PROF#C1. Having not seen the article, though, I accept that the WP:BLP reasons given for the WP:PROD may, whatever the motive for them, have been sufficiently justified to outweigh the subject's notability - if, on review, you think this to be the case, then feel free either not to restore the article or to take it straight to AfD. Thanks. PWilkinson (talk) 10:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Deleted artist page

Abductive said I should send this message to you: I just got back from a trip and saw that you deleted an article I was working on about an artist. Please restore it so I can continue to improve it. I don't understand what the problem was. I cited a number of reliable sources. Now all the material is gone as I did not save a copy.--Artzi (talk) 08:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

The page was about Sari Srulovich, a well-known Israeli artist who teaches at the country's leading school of art and whose work is in the Israel Museum.--Artzi (talk) 08:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello. We did not have an article titled Sari Srulovich. If you know the exact title of the former article I can probably undelete it. However, please note if it was deleted via the "PROD" policy, it could be re-deleted if improvements are not made. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Sari Srulovitch. Sorry.--Artzi (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!--Artzi (talk) 09:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Guiffy SureMerge

Guiffy SureMerge article was deleted July 20th. Please undelete so I can resolve any issues. Britcher (talk) 12:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello Britcher. I've restored it in accordance with policy however if the article is not improved to meet Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines it could be deleted again via other means. Rjd0060 (talk) 06:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank You. I'll work on it beginning today. I should be finished in a couple days. Britcher (talk) 09:16, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring

Hi. I think I should explain about the edit warring in the Swedish general election, 2014 article. It was all started by an user who kept pushing forward his own view of things in the article without consensus, constantly reverting others' edits and even adding an OR tag in order to be able to defend an "there is an OR tag and you can't remove it"-like argument. We brought the issue to the talk page, but in the meantime the user refused to undo his editions until consensus could be reached whether for the tag to be added or not. Furthermore, user Number 57 and myself posted links explaining how there were no violations of wikipedia policy for translating party names, and in case of doubt, even posted links where those party names where shown in English (yet that user kept maintaining the OR tag). The user in question did none of those, only defending what was a personal opinion. Respectable as it was, of course, but still merely a personal opinion. While I understand the rationale of sending me a warning, since this is how Wikipedia works, I don't believe it is fair to ask me to stop, seeing from the article talk page that I had already expressed my intention (and I did it twice) not to further engage in that edit warring, precisely because of the 3RR, not making any edit since I first expressed my will to do so. I hope this brings some light to the issue. Cheers. Impru20 (talk) 08:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Impru20. Edit warring is disruptive to the editing atmosphere and the page history. Edit warring over content is one thing but once it started to reverting a maintenance template, that was about all I needed to see. I stand by my warnings to all of you and suggest the use of discussion or pursuit of dispute resolution methods. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

The maintenance template was added by the user in question in the middle of the edit warring, without either consensus or strong argumentation behind it, with the sole purpose of preventing others from discussing the issue because of such a template's sole presence. I mean, should not the addition of such a tag in such a disputed situation require, at least, a previous consultation with the involved parties or some kind of consensus? I don't think it is fair that an user keeps reverting others' edits without consensus, turns the article into an edit warring because of users trying to revert his doings, then adds a maintenance tag on his own right to prevent others from intervening and then, when an administrator intervenes and orders the warring to stop, the tag is left there; without discussion ever taking place about the opportunity of the template being added or not.

I do recognize, however, my fault on entering that edit warring, something I should have refrained from doing earlier than I did. Cheers. Impru20 (talk) 17:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

OTRS-member

Is there any particular rule that who will receive the OTRS-member or not? — revi^{^} 03:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for helping with the vandalism on the talk page. I dream of horses @ 04:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey, you think this was the same person? I suspect so. --I dream of horses @ 05:43, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Which one specifically, I dream of horses? I hard-blocked blocked 107.178.40.0/21 - every IP before that block was under the range. I see that the page was protected for a bit though. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

The IPs that start with 107.178...--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 18:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi neel Here

Hi Neel Motwani Here.. How Are You , Hope You Are Doing Well

... Wel I was Just Going Through The google Yesterday And Saw That You Have Created A Wiki For Me .. But , Then Today Morning Isaw Yu ve Deleted ... May I know Why .. And If I want To Make One , How To ... Thank you ..

lOts Of Love And Wishes .. god Bless You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neelmotwani (talk • contribs) 07:13, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

The Generation Rescue, et al situation

Resolved

Look, I think all or most of us would be quite happy to leave the situation if OTRS administrators were dealing with it. But so far, all you've actually said is:

1. That you are aware of it
2. [In response to proposed restrictions on OTRS volunteers] That this was an isolated incident.

You haven't actually given any indication that, for instance, the OTRS admins have procedures in place for dealing with it, and will do so, or even - and I do think this would be enough - that you have talked to Mdann, and are sure the situation won't arise again.

It's giving the impression that the OTRS admins either have no means in place to deal with volunteer problems, or don't see this sort of behaviour as an issue. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I've replied on the board. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. That should go a long way to calming the situation. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 08:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

It seems the same OTRS team member has made assertions of "super editor" status on other articles. See Suzannah Lipscomb and the related discussion on BLPN. I think this is further reason for emphasis and clarity at VTR. Just informing you, I reasonably assume the situations with the individual editor are being addressed through OTRS admin. As this involves the same editor I am also going to assume it is not a widespread issue within OTRS, but I believe close scrutiny should be applied in reviewing OTRS team agents edits by appropriate admins, with particular attention to claims of authority and lack disclosure of COI driven edits. I understand the outreach value of OTRS and the volume involved but quantity is not an excuse for policy violation etc. My desire is not to cause extra drama, but to ensure policy is adhered to. - - MrBill3 (talk) 04:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

That edit is over a month old. As I already stated, the issue with this editor has been addressed and policies/protocols, internal and external, have been clarified. Rjd0060 (talk) 05:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Is there a clear and explicit policy that state ANY edit driven/inspired/suggested by a party with a COI made by an OTRS team member MUST disclose such COI nature on the talk page of the article edited? I think this is absolutely and urgently needed. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter and for your contributions to the project. Sorry for bringing old stuff up, it just came to my attention. - - MrBill3 (talk) 05:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

It needs to be done. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Again, as far as OTRS goes, we're done with this issue. If the WP community wants to continue to discuss things, go right ahead. But we've done everything that we need to do to ensure our agents are aware of policies. You may wish to continue talking with the other two admins who have stepped in if you still have questions. Cheers. Rjd0060 (talk) 05:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Please point me to the OTRS policy on COI and the other involved admins. Thanks. - - MrBill3 (talk) 05:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, please do. The discussions have shown that this type of stonewalling is creating a Streisand effect and not meeting concerns. We believe you when you say that you have been discussing these problems internally, but the community needs to see written measures which satisfy us that future problems will be prevented. We need more than assurances that "we are taking care of this", because they don't cut it. -- Brangifer (talk) 16:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Resolved

As I stated very, very clearly: I have supplied more than what was requested. If you wish to continue to beat this horse, you can do so with the assistance of some other OTRS admin. Both Keegan and Pajz have been commenting throughout. I am not prepared to continue the back-and-forth circular arguments about the same thing over and over again. I am not the only OTRS administrator and I have taken steps back from this situation several days ago. Good luck. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Kingdom of Araucanía and Patagonia

Hello, Would you please restore the original version of this page before vandalism. The page online is not the original one but a vandalised one. Thanks a lot. Vulson (talk) 12:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Vulson

Hi Vulson. The article Kingdom of Araucanía and Patagonia is not deleted, it is protected from editing due to abuse. If you cannot edit the page you must request your change by adding it to the articles talk page. I cannot make an edit for you. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not the author of vandalism. And the original page is a translation of the original French page, both vandalisez by two anonymous contibutors.Vulson (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Again, I cannot help you. You must file a note on the article talk page (click "talk" at the top of the article). Rjd0060 (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, quick question

You answered a post I had on another page so I thought maybe you'd answer one on your own. :-)

I have a problem with an editor. I'm working on talking it out, although they are currently dismissive and not at all assuming good faith ("useless edits" and accusations of NPOV against me for no apparent reason) and I have had no response from them yet. They've even warned me about edit warring, although I could equally do the same to them... Anyway, my question is: how do I escalate a conflict? If I find a person is being protectionist/possessive of a page or otherwise intransigent in a way that isn't related to appropriate Wikipedia behavior, what is the next step? I'm a long-term user, since 2004, but my edits are normally not very confrontational: I fix wikilinks and spelling and grammar and formatting (cites, etc.) so honestly I don't know what I do next. Ogress _smash! 21:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Ogress, I happened to see this and left them a note of my own. A lot of their recent behavior is contrary to a few policies so if they continue, we'll be having more discussions. WP:ANI would likely be a good place (if it escalates) given that there is more than one issue so a separate noticeboard would be inappropriate.

For other information on dispute resolution, see this page. I hope this helps. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Oh! Thank you. I'm just hoping they are simply tired of pro/anti-Dorje Shugden trolls and were having a bad day, we've all been there. I had posted on their own page a hopefully polite laurel branch. Ogress _smash! 21:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Rjd0060, I've been watching these articles and trying to be a neutral there, but I am seeing an ongoing pattern of WP:BAITING of VG by a bunch of people who appear to have single use accounts or even sockpuppet accounts (Notably Audrey37 for the latter) and are dogpling her with POV pushing all linked to the Western Shugden Society perspective. Ogress appears to be new to the party and may not realize the environment she has waded into. VG is probably feeling a little besieged and needs some support; she's up against some people who aren't playing fair. Montanabw^(talk) 22:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Montanabw, unfortunately that does not matter when it comes to the civility, potential ownership and/or other issues I saw. As I said, I was not commenting on the content - but anybody would agree by looking at the history that things are not right. Ogress is surely not the only one at fault as it typically takes two to tango, but I still stand my my comment on their page. Ogress has the same dispute resolution options as everybody else. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Just saying that in this case, we have about five tangoing, and some are trolls... FWIW. ;-) I'm trying to watch out there, but I have other drahmahz elsewhere too. Sometimes "ownership" is quality control. But I do think there was a point about piped links and I commented on it at VG's page. I think she trusts that I am not one of the trolls attempting to sanitize the article. (If you want some background, note the pointy RM request by yet another user at 14th Dalai Lama) Montanabw^(talk) 22:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Sure. :-) I briefly skimmed the situation prior but I realized the content issue itself was a bit too much for me to opine on. My only intention is to encourage more discussion and less banter. Thanks for the help. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Postano

Hi Ryan,

I work for TigerLogic and the product Postano which was marked as 'deleted / spam'. We're an actual product (www.postano.com) actively selling and we use best white hat only practices (nor am I aware of any grey or black hat in the past). We'd like to reopen the page. Would you please suggest what materials you would need to undelete us? thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scotthuber (talk • contribs) 23:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ryan,

I'd appreciate your help on this, or if I'm requesting in the wrong way, I'd appreciate the feedback. Thank you.

-Scott Scotthuber (talk) 21:59, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles can only be kept on Wikipedia if they meet certain inclusion guidelines. They are quite specific to the topic area so you should probably start at WP:N. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:24, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Sofia Kenin page removal

You did removed "Sofia Kenin" page. The reason ; "this player is not notable by project standards; she has no Fed Cup or WTA main draw appearances, has not won any ITF tournaments above the $25,000 category, had no remarkable junior career (neither...)" It show how little , if nothing you know about tennis(Junior tennis) ... She is 15 years old !!! What are you talking about ??, "no Fed Cup or WTA main draw appearances"?? No remarkable junior career (neither...)????! . All information is on internet ! She is one of the best players in USA and in the world at her age .. Please, do your research before removing an article and leaving completely incompetent comments .. If it was done by applying criteria that is not related to 15 y.o. player, I would understand and am open to discuss it and defend my point of view.... Please, do respond to my message.. Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Akenin (talk • contribs) 02:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

You're right - I know absolutely nothing about tennis. Please read the entire deletion reason and click the link that says "PROD". It will explain why the article was deleted and how it can be restored. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

The IP range for 158.59.0.0

The IP range from 158.59.0.0/16 belongs to Arlington Public Schools, and these IPs are often used to vandalize pages, just look at the user page for this IP. I recommend blocking all IPs in this range, but allowing constructive edits if they sign in with a user account. 158.59.128.11 (talk) 15:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Day Translations, Inc. Removal

Hello, this is my first time working with Wikipedia, so please forgive my potential mistakes. I'm currently working for Day Translations, Inc., and have been asked to alter the wikipedia page to save it from being deleted. What will I have to do to make sure the page is suitable for Wikipedia's purposes? Thank you very much,

Chris Lemanski (talk) 20:31, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of page Will St Leger

Hi Ryan, Please review our deletion of page on Will St Leger [[5]] citing 'not notable'. I believe Wiki's notability criteria had been met and as I've worked on this page and intended to update page with recent independent articles and reviews' [[6]]

If notoabily was in doubt, discussion on talk page should be started before deletion.

(Diagear (talk) 14:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC))

Hi Diagear. Note that in accordance with the Proposed Deletion policy which was cited in the deletion log, an article is deleted without reason (other than nomination in the proposed deletion process) after a PROD tag remains in place after a week. I have no personal opinion on the article. I see that it was already restored. In accordance with the same policy, that is permitted upon simple request. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Help

Hi! I noticed that you had previously blocked IP user 66.168.88.182. Please review Dylan Dreyer pages history and see if you think it should be blocked again. ACase0000 (talk) 03:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)