Welcome!

Hello, Remisc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 19:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

June 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Omar al-Bashir has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 16:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Moving/merging edit

The article Toyota bB has been restored to its original position pending consensus for a merge, as another contributor objected. Please see Help:Merge for information on how to list the proposal for consensus. I see that after moving the article to its new name, you attempted to perform a merge yourself by pasting the contents of Scion xB into the article. This is called a "cut & paste move", and unless done correctly it creates licensing problems because it separates the text from its history, which is needed for attribution. If you wish to merge two articles together and there are no objections to the articles being merged, it is better to seek the assistance of an administrator as set out at Help:Merge who can properly combine the articles while still retaining the contribution history. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Myron Lowery edit

 

A tag has been placed on Myron Lowery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Remisc! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 939 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Gina Raemer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:Bing.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Bing.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 02:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Mtclemens.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mtclemens.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 06:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gregory Eason edit

 

A tag has been placed on Gregory Eason requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 01:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Deputy Mayor of the City of Flint, Michigan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently non-notable (based on GHits/GNews search) political office.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 02:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quinnie Cody edit

Do you have any references for this biographical article? Regards, PDCook (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Quinnie Cody edit

 

The article Quinnie Cody has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.


If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 16:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quinnie Cody edit

This edit certainly seems like vandalism. I'm not sure why you'd do that to an article you created yourself, but I recommend against such actions in the future. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ghetto. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barb Dempsey, you will be blocked from editing. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

East Ridge, Tenn edit

Gina Raemer is not, and never has been, mayor of East Ridge. I haven't been able to find much about her at all, as searches bring up sites that directly quote your wiki entry. In fact, I haven't been able to find a single soul in the town with that surname.

  • Mayor Mike Steele
  • Elected: 11/7/06
  • Term: 12/25/06 - 12/20/10

Out of curiosity, where did you come up this story? Goon MacSloop (talk) 10:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Cockrel.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Cockrel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I nominated File:Mayordempsey.jpg, File:Panoramicmtclemens.jpg, and File:Mayornotte.jpg for deletion for the same reason. Hekerui (talk) 16:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Roseville, Michigan and 2000 Census edit

Dear Remisc, Your edit purported to change the numbers of the 2000 census to some other numbers. I don't know if the new numbers are accurate for the "2010 census", but the text as you left it indicated it was for 2000, and the numbers are plainly wrong for that year. That is why I reverted the edits. Since this was apparently a good faith mistake, I should have used "undo", and will do so in the future if and when I encounter similar problems from you. Please see the Roseville, Michigan talk page. In the future, please sign your posts with four tildes. Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen () 12:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mount Clemens, Michigan edit

Your population edits to this article were not constructive, appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. Please use the sandbox if you wish to make test edits. See the Mount Clemens, Michigan talk page for a real source concerning population. 7&6=thirteen () 14:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gina Raemer edit

 

The article Gina Raemer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mayor of fairly small settlement, unable to find any sources, possible hoax (see talk)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hut 8.5 14:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Be careful about Demographic section edits edit

Your edit to the Warren, Michigan demographics section gave the misleading impression that the 2000 ethnicity figures are the figures for 2010. You need to be careful to make sure that edits to population figures do not end up giving the impression that some figures belong to years that they do not infact belong to.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:32, 14 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Trolololololol.png edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Trolololololol.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:16, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Mahaffey.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Mahaffey.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kim Jong-il edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kim Jong-il. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. GDallimore (Talk) 00:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 16 edit

Hi. When you recently edited Macomb County, Michigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M-59 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:28, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Marriage.celeb 10021.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Marriage.celeb 10021.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Quinnie Cody edit

 

The article Quinnie Cody has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 10:52, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bud Evans edit

 

The article Bud Evans has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Shirt58 (talk) 05:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Kaybud.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Kaybud.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA talkedits 08:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clinton Township, Macomb County, Michigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roseville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfD Richard J. Notte edit

Nomination of Richard J. Notte for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard J. Notte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard J. Notte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spshu (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Remisc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Cody3453.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cody3453.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Barb Dempsey edit

 

The article Barb Dempsey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A mayor of a relatively small town with nothing to suggest notability. Fails WP:POLITICIAN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayWhat did I do? 08:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Quinnie Cody edit

 

The article Quinnie Cody has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A mayor of a small town with no indication of notability. Fails WP:POLITICIAN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayWhat did I do? 08:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply