Redundant Farmhand
Redundant Farmhand, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Redundant Farmhand! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC) |
Redundant Farmhand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Banned for the extremely flimsy reason that I supposedly agree with someone else about a disputed subject and used the same word as them. Redundant Farmhand (talk) 13:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Redundant Farmhand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wasn't causing any damage or disruption and wasn't banned for this. I understand what I was I was banned for. I was banned because my views on this subject happened to coincide with some other person. No other evidence has been provided. The history of the race concept isn't particularly esoteric, and you have to expect people are going to come along and counter the narrative being pushed by the team that appear to control the article. It's rather sad that on "the encyclopedia anyone can edit", pointing out errors on the talk page results in you being accused of being "one of the bad guys who said this already" (in a world of several billion people you may find more than one person who disagrees with some of your cliques of regulars) and banned for "damage and disruption". None of this is accurate, I was politely highlighting omissions in the article, with a view to improving it. Redundant Farmhand (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Redundant Farmhand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Wait I'm blocked because I am a "sockpuppet" of the various "farmer" accounts? Yes they are all me, I just forgot the password and made a new account. Redundant Farmhand (talk) 12:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No compelling reason to unblock given the case presented at SPI signed, Rosguill talk 06:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.