Redcloud822
WPCHINA evaluations edit
Hey, thanks for offering to help out with WP:CHINA evaluations. However, I noticed that your assessment on the article Political status of Taiwan had some problems: First, there was already a WP:China tag on the talk page, but you added two more tags, one stub rating at the top, and another stub rating at the bottom. Each talk page should have only one WPCHINA tag, the parameters of which can be modified to change the rating. Secondly, a Stub rating is far too low for this article, in my opinion. A B rating does not imply that the article is perfect, or even nearly so. It denotes an article with a lot of good info that still needs work, which I think describes Political status of Taiwan. If you disagree with this rating, feel free to bring up the issue on Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject China. Once again, thanks for your help in assessment.--Danaman5 19:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- I was a little confused as to where to put the ratings. So I ended up put in my ratings in different cessions. Please delete the extra rating I entered. Thanks. I may change my rating on the article later. I do realize the article is better than I thought. I am not sure if you can receive this massage, if you do, would let me know please? Redcloud822 20:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yup, I have your talk page on my watchlist, so I saw your response. Thanks for your explanation.--Danaman5 21:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Pacific War edit
I replied to your comment on my talk page, and clarified the sentence in the Pacific War article to reflect that many Japanese regarded themselves as the cultural heirs, not that it was a fact. Parsecboy 20:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)