User talk:RedHillian/Archive 2

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Artlondon (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

--RedHillian (talk) 22:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Maelstrom (live role playing game)

A tag has been placed on Maelstrom (live role playing game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 07:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

RH, Take a look at this: http://forums.rule7.co.uk/Topic81707-37-2.aspx?Update=1  EdFortune (talk) 10:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Prod on Steve Schaeffer

Hi - Steve Schaeffer is currently undergoing an improvement drive, I had the same notability concerns about it (have a look through the history) but I'm giving a fairly new editor who'd created it a chance to shine (and trying hard to not bite the newbie) - if it still falls through then I'll start up the relevant action to get it removed. --RedHillian (talk) 02:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

That's why I switched to a prod instead of a straight A7; gives 'em some time to make their case. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Totally, I'd have done the same as well but the newbie seems to be a little scared of the process, but they seem to be genuine in the attempt - on this occasion I'd like to give them the benefit without too much redtape at it. (Also, copied my original message to you in so I can keep track, not so keen on split conversations.) --RedHillian (talk) 02:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

City Radio Preston

Why do people keep removing this from Preston?

It is an actual radio station in preston... an explaination would be nice?

Pr0tax (talk) 20:09, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, I removed the link for the page City Radio Preston as it doesn't exist on Wikipedia - hence it shows up as a redlink, when the page has been created (and satisfies Wikipedia's notability requirements) then a link to it from the Preston article would be appropriate. As for why I removed the external link, that's because external links that are not directly relevant to the page they are on are discouraged - you can see more in the Wikipeda policy page on external links. --RedHillian | Talk 20:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Rebuiling Maelstrom (live role playing game)

Once I have stuff together, I'm going to put this article in order and recreate it - wih notability asserted properly, assuming we can do it.

Want to help?

Notes can go here! --RedHillian | Talk 01:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Person seeking help

I need someone to talk to. I am contemplating on killing something. Maybe a tree, maybe a plant, maybe a flower. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.11.179.154 (talk) 01:26, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be in a position to help you - perhaps you'd be better off talking to a person in real life - a close friend or family member. --RedHillian | Talk 01:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

My friends are nonexistant and my only living family member is in jail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.11.179.154 (talk) 17:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

delection of suspension

why delete a fact? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.20.79.230 (talk) 05:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I presume you're reffering to this edit at Xavier College - Wikipedia requires sources for all information in the encyclopedia, more information on this can be found at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Please also remember to sign your edits on talk pages with 4 tiles (~~~~). --RedHillian | Talk 06:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC).

Hello again mate. I concur. Why delete a fact? Sure it has not been referenced, that does not mean you need to delete it. And it actually is a fact with references from newspapers all over the net. What if I painstakingly copied the entire Bible to the internet and you deleted it because I forgot to write which Bible I had copied from? How about putting up a notice indicating that it needs a reference? You are right that it needs referencing, but you are WRONG in deleting it. I recommend you re-read the page on wikipedia etiquette. Boogiefever1985 (talk) 06:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this particualr edit, there was no reference provided. --RedHillian | Talk 06:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I know there was no reference provided. My point is that you are not required to delete edits that are not referenced. That is not your role. You should however indicate on the page that a reference is REQUIRED. Maybe then you can delete it if he doesn't reference it within a few days. Give people a chance. Especially newcomers. What you do is tantamount to ripping up a child's drawing because they forget to write their name on it. Just tell the kid to put their name on it! They will do it! DO NOT DELETE WITHOUT WARNING> GIVE PEOPLE A CHANCE TO FIX THE PROBLEM BEFORE YOU JUMP IN AND START DELETING THINGS! I hope you understand me now. Thankyou. Boogiefever1985 (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Amazing Feminist Edit

How did you find my edit so quickly? One time a few years ago I did somthing similar to Star Wars and tried to blame it on star trek, it got reverted after 5 minutes, but that was like 20 seconds max! why cant you leave it there for at least 20 minutes just to annoy some lesbos, then we can revert it and pretend everything is cool! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.138.183 (talk) 06:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Magic. --RedHillian | Talk 06:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

deletion of my comment re the "COLOUR" page

I recently explained that it was stupid to use the English dialect used on the first non-stub version of the "colour" page. This is not conducive to good debate and decision-making regarding which spelling to use. As I said, what if it had been a rare English dialect in which they spell it "kuluh"? If that had been used on the first non-stub version would you have recognised it as a legitimate dialect and fought to keep the title? Of course not. It is a stupid argument and it goes against what wikipedia is all about. We should have a debate or so-called "spelling war" over it. Why? Why not? Spelling wars are just as valid as any other point of contention debated in wikipedia. I will seek further support of my view on the discussion page for "colour." And who gives you the right to say that my comments were unconstructive? Maybe your removal of them was deconstructive... Sorry rant over. Boogiefever1985 (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm not opposed to the debate on the appropriate use of color/colour, but the proper place for it is on the talk page for the relevant article, not in the article itself. --RedHillian | Talk 06:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

So is my thing still reverted

I'm just want to clarify before I take a step furtherVault9Dweller (talk) 08:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

It's still reverted, but go ahead and add the content back as you intended - I made a mistake using an automated tool so I can't easily get back to the article in question! --RedHillian | Talk

Wow

You're fast! I can see you don't use Twinkle.. and you're reverting way too fast to be doing it manually. What do you use? Antivenin (talk) 08:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm using huggle! --RedHillian | Talk 08:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, all I can say is, wow. Antivenin (talk) 08:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

It's a powerful tool - if you do vandalism reverting yourself, it's worth looking into! --RedHillian | Talk 08:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I need permission for rollback. I'll apply a bit later. When I gather more edits. (Which, BTW, is gonna be a little tough. You happen to be taking all the good ones.) Antivenin (talk) 08:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

You'd be suprised how much vandlism there is - but yeah, get a little experience (and don't worry - I can't get it all, and it's not a race!) and rollback (which is very useful). --RedHillian | Talk 08:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Haha. Maybe not all. But loads. Well, congrats once again. Huggle seems to be quite useful. =D Antivenin (talk) 08:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou

For the revision of vandalism to my talk page. Other people always know more about me than even I do! ;) Cheers :) \ / (⁂) 10:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem, glad I could help! --RedHillian | Talk 10:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Confused

Not sure why you say I vandalized certificate of deposit by correcting the link name on the citation that I added ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.183.149.93 (talk) 21:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC) --Autosigned by SineBot-->

The addition of the words Rip Off made it look like vandalism - I've reverted it back to your edit and cancelled the warning on your page. Sorry. --RedHillian | Talk 21:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Aha! Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.183.149.93 (talk) 21:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey Connor!

Welcome to Wikipedia! It's nice to see you so enthusiastic about contributing, but Wikipedia is not the place to create personal pages. If you want, there are plenty of articles out there where you can contribute. But please don't recreate the article on yourself. Feel free to message me if I can answer any questions. LeilaniLad (talk) 03:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

BZZZ Wrong answer! ;) - I'm also anti-vandal patrolling with huggle, I think you've pasted to the wrong user!. --RedHillian | Talk 03:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Well shoot... The kid was so enthusiastic I wanted to try and point him in the right direction. Thanks RH! LeilaniLad (talk) 03:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem - I've done it myself! --RedHillian | Talk 03:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Wondering why you said i was vandelizing

I posted a comment under the color white under board games. It was the result of a game you play when you are bored. I was talking about the game guess what color I'm thinking of. What were you thinking? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmankewl (talk • contribs) 03:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for a guide to appropriate content on the project. --RedHillian | Talk 04:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Huggle making reverts on pages that haven't been viewed?

Is this a known issue with automatically going to the next article after a revert? Its happened pretty regularly since I enabled that. LeilaniLad (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

The only time I've expereinced that myself has been when I've double clicked a button and huggle's got ahead of me. Maybe something for the feedback/bug reports? --RedHillian | Talk 04:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I added the issue to the bug report, I seemed to have narrowed it down to reverting multiple edits by a user on a page coupled with automatically going to the next. Huggle reverts the next change as well automatically. You can see it if you turn on confirmation of multiple reverts by the same user. Just FYI. LeilaniLad (talk) 12:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Cheers for the heads up - I'll keep an eye on what my console tries to do as well! Happy spam-hunting! --RedHillian | Talk 12:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert. =) Now there's was an insult I never heard before... not! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem! --RedHillian | Talk

User:Ausimus

sorry about the suspected vandalism had a prob with the keyboard wasn't deliberately doing it Ausimus (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

OK, but please be more careful next time - ry using the preview button. --RedHillian | Talk 08:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

It's Okey

No a probelm bro... I tought there was nothing a Malay version in wikipedia. Anyway. Thanks for doing a good job. Peace. Melario (talk) 09:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

That's fine - if you would like there is a full list of all the languages wikipedia is in at Meta:List of Wikipedias. --RedHillian | Talk 09:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

JK Rowling

Hey, I did provide a source. I even gave a direct quote of J.K. Rowling. Please consider the fact that I wasn't tying to be a jackass. I was adding true, on topic, useful info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.117.66.245 (talk) 16:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I've reviewed the link for the citation. It leads to a review of a satirical interview, which definitely does not count as a verifiable source, and as per the Wikipedia rules on biographies of living persons, I have removed it and will not re-insert it. All useful contributions are welcomed, but please carefully check the verifiability and source of anything that you wish to add. Thank you. --RedHillian | Talk 16:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

The source included an interview and had direct quotes of J.K Rowling. but if you insist that it is a review and not a source would you consider re-posting it if I provided other sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.117.66.245 (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Millwright link

If the unions get a link so should my staffing firm. www.gruspersonnel.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebeing (talk • contribs) 16:34, 23 October 2008

Please see the wikipedia policy on external links & conflicts of interest. --RedHillian | Talk 16:37, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Fistgate

Fistgate was not an attack page. It acurately reported the significant events around the scandal. If you have additional ideas to add to the issue you are welcome to do so, but to delate an article on the issue just because you do not want it brought up is unacceptable.Johnpacklambert (talk) 20:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Semi Protected Jelly

Hi there, lately jelly has been subject to various vandalisms from unregistered IPs. They keep doing it every 3/4 days and I think it seems like the same person. This person is demonstrating that somebody with a mental age of 8 can edit in wikipedia. I actually think an 8 year old would be more serious. Do you know any admins who will be able to semiprotect this page? I have only been collaborating in the english wikipedia for a few months now, and still haven't met any admins. Bye!--Arthurbrown (talk) 07:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Your message to me 22-10-2008

Message read: "The recent edit you made to Louis Pasteur constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --RedHillian | Talk 18:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)"

Not me squire! Wouldn't dream of doing that - Wikipedia is far too valuable to wreck. Maybe it had something to do with me not having a sign in at that time (created today) in response to the suggestions about this sort of thing.

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yanneracine (talk • contribs) 23:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Rebeca Lush.

You wrote,

"Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Rebecca Lush. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you.--RedHillian | Talk 04:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)"

In no specific order. The person in question has questionable qualifications and motives. Here is one easily confirmed example, she wants everyone to use busses instead of cars to improve air quality and health. Oddly busses run on diesel, which have been scientificaly proven to both cause global dimming and then go on to cause 90% of lethal asthma attacks and cause (otherwise healthy) people to become asthmatic, despite those facts she continues her tirades. This lack of knowledge is even more obvious where ever she sticks here oar in - you should read her web page, its hilarious. She will uncriticaly embrace the most preposerous idea and claim it as proven fact.... As long as it supports her current fad.

The Tintwhistle baypass is desperately needed. Given that you have removed this fact from here page means that you have never tried to drive through the town (and seen the messages in just about every window or garden, not to mention the endless signs on lampposts pleading for a bypass). Hidden gatsos every 30 yards - not that you can ever go quick enough to get a speeding ticket, its far too congested. Half an hour to pass through a small town, at off peak times - you should see it on Saturdays.... Given the huge area of the Peak District, a town in Tintwhistle's position can only be described as "on the boarder", in the same way that you can only describe your front door as on the boarder of your house (unless you have a front door actually inside your house, which would by definition make it an internal door, but i digress).

In conclusion, Lush is nothing more than a loud activist with sub-GCSE knowlegde but well placed contacts.

As for libelous comments about living persons... Have you read Michael Barrymoore's page reciently? It reads like a column from The Sun. Which it probably is - but there you are, Barrymore isnt popular anymore is he?. Or in terms of accuracy, what about the articles on PS3/360? They demonstrate clear unregulated (and untrue) bias in favour of the weaker console.

Having said all that above, it wont change anything. The only people who would look at her entry would be those who are either for or against her, you have corrected (and i use the word "corrected" quite inaccurately, on the irony) my components, which means you - by definition - must at least lean in her direction. you could, of course, prove me wrong. Im not holding my breath. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.37.58 (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Biography pages relating to living person on Wikipedia are subject to the Wikipedia policy on Biographies of Living Persons, see also Wikipedia policy on Original Research. If The Sun newspaper and/or Michael Barrymore wish to contribute to Wikipedia, they will have follow the same rules here as well. My personal attitude to Ms. Lush is irrelevant (for the record, I disagree with her on many significant points). --RedHillian | Talk 00:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)