Home Talk (A1 & A2) Sandbox Contributions

See also

Please read MOS:SEEALSO. See also sections should not have items that are either mentioned and linked within the article already, or are included in a navbar at the bottom of the page. For the Call of Duty Modern Warfare games, this is already the case. -- ferret (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Causes of the 2019 Hong Kong protests, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 19:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lists of 2019 Hong Kong protests

 

The article Lists of 2019 Hong Kong protests has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of protests in Hong Kong exists

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violation

  Your addition to 2019 Hong Kong protests has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. A-NEUN ⦾TALK⦾ 21:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

  • May I ask which part of the edit violated the copyright? RealFakeKim (talk) 08:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Lists of 2019-2020 Hong Kong protests for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of 2019-2020 Hong Kong protests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of 2019-2020 Hong Kong protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jax 0677 (talk) 06:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Auto archive

There is no need to manually archive anything. The bot will pick up any threads and move them to the archives automatically. In fact, it's hard to edit talk page sections because the section number keeps on shifting. CoronavirusPlagueDoctor (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Flattening the curve redirect notice on Social distancing

Hi RealFakeKIm. I reverted your edit on Social distancing. I respectfully disagree with your reasoning. Flattening the curve redirects there & there is currently no mention specifically of "Flatten the curve" in that section. We need to provide a soft landing so users know they have arrived at the right place & do not experience WP:SURPRISE. Please discuss on the talk page if you think this is incorrect. Peaceray (talk) 17:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

COVID general sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Johnuniq (talk) 09:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

weird revert

[1] What did you just do here, and why this weird message[2] on my talk page? I thought my edit summary explained what happened. I added some stuff to the article and then reverted it because it was the wrong article. It was supposed to have gone here, different and much more famous book of similar title. I thought I had been reverted by a misbehaving bot, but now can't tell. 2601:648:8202:96B0:E0CB:579B:1F5:84ED (talk) 09:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

  • Your edit came up as suspected vandalism so I looked into it and reverted it back to before you started to edit it. The warning was me on autopilot I'm sorry about that as you noticed your mistake yourself. I will remove it right away. RealFakeKimT 09:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. 2601:648:8202:96B0:E0CB:579B:1F5:84ED (talk) 09:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

You Might Be a Zombie and Other Bad News

You might consider reading the section you restored, and asking yourself whether it falls under the category of original research. Then, go back to my edit summary and see if it gives "original research" as the reason for removal. I think you'll be surprised. 173.52.52.239 (talk) 12:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

  • It does sound like WP:OR but the section cites two sources one being a book and the other a review. RealFakeKimT 15:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

 

Hi RealFakeKim. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ {sting} 06:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

 

Hi RealFakeKim! You created a thread called Want to start scripting at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


The WikiLoop Battlefield weekly barnstar

  The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar
Congratulations, RealFakeKim

You have been recognized as the weekly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
a crowdsource counter-vandalism patrol and label tool (http://battlefield.wikiloop.org)
for the week ending at 2020-03-30.


On behalf of the team and community of WikiLoop Battlefield and as Wikipedians, we like to appreciate your contributions, and look forward for more in the future. Also don't forget to bring your Wikipedian friends who you think are also passionate of keeping Wikipedia protected.

By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
Cheers, xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 02:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)



Tablighi Jamaat

Hi, Recently one of the Article on Tablighi Jamaat is being rapidly disrupted, it is not corona virus actually. It is a non-political global missionary movement. Please take a look at 2019 revisions of Tablighi Jamaat. Rocky 734 (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

  • I deeply apologise I got the boxes the wrong way around and thought you added the coronavirus part. Sorry, RealFakeKimT 15:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

yancy Butler

I’m new to this format but saw not messages on my page when you ripped down my updates. What you’re posting is wrong and inaccurate. The 2017 data is the most inaccurate. This is damaging professionally and I don’t know why you’d keep posting it back. Why? Crazyeyes85 (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

You might have me confused with someone else I have not posted anything on your talk page and in my last 500 edits I havent reverted one of your edits. RealFakeKimT 15:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Why you reverted my edits on Oscar by the Sea?

Why you reverted my edits on Oscar by the Sea? I put reference to my edit and you just delete it without knowing the truth. Did you search something about this estate? I worked on it for days and what I get is this. This is disappointing. Please do not remove anything unless it is really wrong. Thanks. M Town Citizen (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

  • I am truly sorry for undoing your edit. It must have been me double-tapping a shortcut key on Huggle. I have removed your warning and restored the page to your edit. In future press the undo button next to the revision under the view history tab if you disagree with it. Again I'm sorry, RealFakeKimT 15:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14

The WikiLoop Battlefield weeklyly barnstar

  The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar
Congratulations, RealFakeKim

You have been recognized as the weeklyly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
a crowdsource counter-vandalism patrol and label tool (http://battlefield.wikiloop.org)
for the weekly ending at 2020-04-06.


On behalf of the team and community of WikiLoop Battlefield and as Wikipedians, we like to appreciate your contributions, and look forward for more in the future. Also don't forget to bring your Wikipedian friends who you think are also passionate of keeping Wikipedia protected.

By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
Cheers, xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 08:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)



2019–20 Hong Kong protests

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article 2019–20 Hong Kong protests has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

When the article goes through its Peer Review I suspect the excessive number of citations in it will come up. Simple statements of fact do not need more than two citations at the most.

Best of luck with the article moving forward.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Although some things surounding the protests are very contrivertial. RealFakeKimT 10:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

reFill

Hi, I notice you use reFill. Whilst it is a really useful tool, it is not foolproof. It has not been updated since dead-url= was unsupported in favour of url-status= and therefore can introduce cite errors such as at [3], [4] and [5]. Please check your edits before submitting when using reFill. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:November 2019 events of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests

 

A tag has been placed on Category:November 2019 events of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Early 2019 events of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Early 2019 events of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:July 2019 events of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests

 

A tag has been placed on Category:July 2019 events of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15

are u a leftist

im not

RPDhypebeast I'm a progressive. RealFakeKimT 17:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

also can you help me with a wiki article I need help with something — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPDhypebeast (talkcontribs) 16:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Sure what do you want help with? RealFakeKimT 16:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

can you delete the two brakets after caspian sea I dont know how https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lonbar,_Ardabil — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPDhypebeast (talkcontribs) 15:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Timeline of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests (April 2020)

  Hello! Your submission of Timeline of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests (April 2020) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Psiĥedelisto (talk) 21:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 June 8

Sorry for the 4 notifications but I had nominated 3 categories (your creations) to be renamed. Starzoner (talk) 19:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Timeline of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests (April 2020)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Timeline of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests (April 2020) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much RealFakeKimT 15:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear RealFakeKim,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

reFill

Hi, I notice you use reFill. Whilst it is a really useful tool, it is not foolproof. It has not been updated since |dead-url= was unsupported in favour of |url-status= and therefore can introduce cite errors such as at [6] and [7]. Please check your edits before submitting when using reFill.--John B123 (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 18:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

Your draft article, Draft:Hitchcock & Scully

 

Hello, RealFakeKim. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hitchcock & Scully".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi RealFakeKim/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of most popular websites
added links pointing to VK, Twitch, Bing and Amazon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Relapse (Eminem album) into Relapse 2. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)