Readder
Welcome Readder!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.February 2011 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Romani language appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Vlax Romani language. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ISO 639 identifier: rmy = Vlax Romani, as is evident from the source RashersTierney (talk) 12:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Gallipoli Campaign. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at French battleship Bouvet, you may be blocked from editing. RashersTierney (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
January 2012 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Arad, Romania, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 17:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arad, Romania with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 511,526,082) 17:24, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Dacia edit
 |
Hi, I noticed some of you edits for Goths. I think your intentions are good, but you seem a new editor and need to read more about Wikipedia editing, including guidelines like WP:MOS, WP:EDIT, WP:CITE. Otherwise, despite good intentions, you edits will be reverted or removed, and you might ask yourself why. For examples of good articles and to see how sources are properly cited, see Roman Dacia and Celts in Transylvania. Let me know if you need help. Regards. --Codrin.B (talk) 00:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your addition to the article; however, I have removed it since the reference you give is not to a reliable source on this topic. Please see the talk page. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Romania edit
 |
April 2012 edit
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Iași. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please also note our guide to referencing and policy on original research. RashersTierney (talk) 10:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
SPI edit
Please note Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dacodava. RashersTierney (talk) 22:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)