AdhunikaSarvajna

Anti-Hindu violence

Even though there are multiple very closely-related articles, DS is creating an article about Anti-Muslim violence in India. And I presume it will stick since there are many who will like to see an exclusive and utterly one-sided focus on only anti-Muslim violence, who incessantly strive to blindly label every anti-Muslim violence in India as "pogrom".

In light of this and the fact that we already have an article about Anti-Christian violence in India, will it unethical to create an article about Anti-Hindu violence in India as well? Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 08:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

If the consensus is that Religious violence in India should be split up, i see nothing wrong in starting one on Hindus either. One would think that those "neutral" editors would themselves do it. But that says something on how neutral they actually are. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Dharmadhyaksha, if we can have Ant-Muslim/Christian violence articles, we need Anti-Hindu one also, the part of the problem is that there are some highly motivated editors with tremendous energy and time, unfortunately I lack both. Take for example, I had plans of starting an article about Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits which itself is a part of Anti-Hindu violence and too huge and notable enough to have its own article, but somehow I could not create one.-sarvajna (talk) 11:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes. That's what I am saying too.
unfortunately I lack both - don't worry. Wikipedia has no deadline. Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 11:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

(edit conflict)You're right Dharma, that is the problem with Wikipedia (cf. flaws). Although we like to think that the same yardstick is used to measure neutrality of every editor, the truth simply is far from it. IMHO whatever the consensus is, it doesn't, rather mustn't, supersede the neutrality-policy of Wikipedia. I mean, it can't be that only anti-Muslim or anti-Christian violence need to be covered in separate article but when it comes to coverage of anti-Hindu violence, that need for separate articles magically vanishes. Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 11:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

let us wait and see how things progress, there were editors who voted for delete not just because of the name of the article but also because the content was duplicate and a separate article was not required -sarvajna (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

As if duplication is even being considered at the DR. They will all come up with that same article with a different name, hopefully with a neutral title this time. About Kashmiri Pandits, dump all the source you have at User:Ratnakar.kulkarni/Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits and we can start writing it as and when we get time. I usually have many such articles and work on them whenever i get time. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

There are more common perfectly encyclopedic topics which are now redlinked for exampe Minority appeasement in India. I tried to create a partial timeline and got frustuated. For example I have heard many rumors that the Malappuram district in Kerala was carved to secure Muslim votes. Can anyone here knows reliable sources of it. I have seen plenty of sorces from RSS but not a single from any neutral source. Why? it is frustuating. The Legend of Zorro 12:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Some subjects just do not have encyclopaedic value other times it is just not possible to gather enough sources to cover a subject comprehensively. However to show you how to find sources and since you chose to write about Minority appeasement in India here are some ways to find sources:

• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL ←Hope these help. Although I understand why you consider creating an article on that subject, my advise, watching the sheer lack of sources, would be don't waste your time on that unencyclopaedic subject. Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 16:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Dharmadhyaksha, I will dump my sources there, that would be a good idea, I was also planning to rely on books like Our Moon has blood clots which are not available online. User:Solomon7968 it is very very difficult to get sources for such a thing, even if you find any, I am sure it would be labelled as unreliable source. -sarvajna (talk) 12:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

I agree, there is not too much information on this part subjetct on wiki , see also on wikipedia bias https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.wikipedia/u4dJIwvCQc4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nvihlhe (talk • contribs) 16:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

How about some help on semi-complete User:Mrt3366/Discrimination against minorities in Pakistan? (passes GNG "Discrimination against minorities in Pakistan" I guess??) Somebody please conform the intro to WP:LEAD and WP:BEGIN. Shift unsuitable claims to the correct section in the body. That is a headache I can't seem to surmount. Please help me there & I will be very grateful. I will take care of the overuse of quotes myself :). Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 16:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

(tps) I suggest simplifying the lead a lot - along the lines of who these minorites are, that they face discrimination and religious intolerance, and stating the key forms of discrimination and/or major incidents. But, the article and topic look legit to me and there's no reason why it can't be put in wikispace. --regentspark (comment) 17:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

• Quite simply, no sources for this particular subject. Regardless of my lack of "NPOV" lmao do you think I have not looked into this? An extremely good article could be written on this subject, just ask. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:52, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

2002 Gujarat violence

I believe that 'Godhra train burning' section makes reader believe that the fire was an accident. I tried to give other side but my edit was reverted by Qwyrxian. I am discussing on article talkpage and improving draft here. Your feedback is invited. neo (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

The point is that those theories were before the court verdict and should not be given much importance but just a passing reference. -sarvajna (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Obviously, but he is giving so-called 'academic sources' and admin Qwyrxian is impressed by it. So statements of uninvolved reputed bodies and reliable sources are necessary. I will include court verdict also. But if edit was ensues, some admin like RegentsPark will protect his version FOREVER. Please keep it in mind. neo (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Either correct your source misrepresentation here or be reverted. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:19, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

do not act like something is on fire, I am adding sources.-sarvajna (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

And now you had added synthesis to your policy violations, well done. I am reverting you, do not restore that content unless you have a single source which explicitly supports it. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Self revert now or be reported for source misrepresentation, edit warring and synthesis. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:09, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

And this is your forth revert Please self revert and stop. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

That is not a revert it is a correction, regarding the source I have provided my explanation on talk, I feel that you have not really read source. -sarvajna (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Wrong, you had already done that edit once and it was reverted[1] I am now going to report you as you refuse to self revert. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Huh!! Some one has written something wrong, you reverted my edit for a different reason, now you play a smart tactic to bait me into 3RR violation? Hope the admin overseeing it will note that. All I did in my previous edit was to correct things according to the source. -sarvajna (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Tell it to the judge[2] Darkness Shines (talk) 19:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello, Sarvajna:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. EdwardsBot (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Already reported

Already reported that person for edit warring, thanks for reverting the India's page edit. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for all the good work.-sarvajna (talk) 04:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Have a look here Persecution of Hindus, the version i prefer was [3], see the talk page too. "Vanamonde93" had disputed the figure first, now we see fabrication of sources for justifying a Scholarly accepted figure. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

This is the second time you have canvassed for the removal of a reliable source. Do this again and I will report you. StuffandTruth (talk) 13:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

The user uses a journal(re-print) for a claim that requires secondary source. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

It is a secondary source dumbass. It's a journal. StuffandTruth (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

"Care should be taken with journals that exist mainly to promote a particular point of view. A claim of peer review is not an indication that the journal is respected, or that any meaningful peer review occurs. Journals that are not peer reviewed by the wider academic community should not be considered reliable, except to show the views of the groups represented by those journals." Get real "dumbass". Bladesmulti (talk) 18:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Read it again Blade: "Journals that are not peer reviewed by the wider academic community should not be considered reliable" - Cambridge journals are widely respected widely peer reviewed StuffandTruth (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

We got 2 bigger points now. Described on your talk. Check. Bladesmulti (talk) 19:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list

Hello Sarvajna! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Raga

Is he editing his own article? See this IP is behaving just like him; ending every thing with his takia kalam. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Ha ha, someone thought it would be funny. -sarvajna (talk) 16:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Koenraad Elst (serious BLP violations in a BLP article)

There are serious, ongoing and long-term BLP violations in the BLP article Koenraad Elst (see also at the BLP noticeboard).

The BLP article seems to be unstable: Each time someone removes any BLP violations in the article, they are being restored - and an user is again threatening to restore all BLP violations "soon". BLP policy is crucial to be enforced. Because of the very serious NPOV violations in a BLP article, this requires the attention of neutral editors.

The NPOV violations were explained in great detail by the subject of the lemma here:

• The wikipedia lemma on "Koenraad Elst": a textbook example of defamation
• Meera Nanda against Hinduism

These links say among other things:

Well, there you have it. The lemma on me has ended up taking this form because some militant among your contributors purposely wanted to “warn readers” against me. Please cite me an instruction for encyclopedists that names “warning” among the legitimate goals of an encyclopedia.

Either you remove the lemma altogether, or you straighten it out and apply the rules of encyclopedia-writing to it. At any rate, in a encyclopedia, I count on being judged for what I myself have said or done, and not for the gossip my declared enemies have come up with.

If Wikipedia wants to live up to its promise of being a reliable encyclopedic source, it will strike this and all sentences resembling it from its article on me. At most, it can use me as an example of how it was fooled by some of its all-too-partisan collaborators. Speaking of whom: the history page accompanying my page proves forever that some Wikipedia collaborators wanted to inflict on me the maximum harm possible, an attitude incompatible with work for an encyclopedia. --Calypsomusic (talk) 12:00, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive

Hello Sarvajna:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) Josve05a (c) by {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	For filing an RTI to learn the truth about Narendra Modi's Prime Ministership. Tito☸Dutta 15:45, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

• Why are you considering retirement? Tito☸Dutta 15:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Tito thanks a lot for the barnstar, very generous of you. I am busy in my personal and professional life. I don't think I can edit wiki regularly but it is a very bad addiction. Also I am busy filing RTIs :-) sarvajna (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

• Good, very good. Tito☸Dutta 18:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

• Oh! Forgot about this one. Any luck so far? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Dharmadhyaksha - Check this out [4] . If you have a better question, I can raise one more RTI -sarvajna (talk) 10:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Oh! So that was useless. Congress only devised a new method to eat money in small sums; RTI fees. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

ಈ-ಮೇಲ್

ದಯವಿಟ್ಟು ತಾವು ತಮ್ಮ ಈ-ಮೇಲನ್ನು ಸಕ್ರೀಯಗೊಳ್ಳಿಸಬೇಕೆಂದು ತಮ್ಮಲಿ ವಿನಂತಿಸುತ್ತೇನೆ. ನಾನು ತಮಗೆ ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ ಮೂಲಕ ಈ-ಮೇಲ್ ಕಳಿಸಬೇಕು. ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ ಮೂಲಕ ಈ-ಮೇಲ್ ಪಡೆಯಲು, ನೀವು ಲಾಗ್-ಇನ್ ಮಾಡಿ, ಮೇಲೆ, ಬಲ ಭಾಗದಲ್ಲಿ 'ಆದ್ಯತೆಗಳು' ಅನ್ನು ಕ್ಲಿಕ್ ಮಾಡಿ ಮತ್ತು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಈ-ಮೇಲ್ ಸೇರಿಸಿ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.57.204 (talk) 09:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

ಮಾಡಿದ (I mean to say that it is already done, I don't know why you ask me to change it) .-sarvajna (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

ಸರಿ, ದಯವಿಟ್ಟು ನಾನು ಕೇಳಿದ್ದನ್ನು ಮಾಡಿ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.57.216 (talk) 15:34, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

what do you really want me to do? You can mail me. -sarvajna (talk) 19:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

WP:JSTOR access

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.

Restoring sockpuppet edit

Please see this. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

check you talk page. I realized it late. -sarvajna (talk) 17:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

RTI

Fu*k, why are you considering retirement? So sad!
What happened to your RTI appeal that you filed about Narendra Modi - ji? Did you file online RTI? Please ping me at my talk page. Regards. --18:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

• He, he, I incorrectly signed with five tildes, my sign is Tito☸Dutta I have two pending RTI nominations (my first two) a) did Mahatma Gandhi adopt Froze Gandhi (copied from RTI application: Some sites, books and documents claim Mahatma-ji did so, some sites, books and documents claim exactly the opposite. In the Lok Sabha profile Feroze Gandhis fathers name is mentioned Jehangir Gandhi. we had a discussion at Wikipedia, see last sction of Talk:Mahatma_Gandhi/GA2#Information_-_Details b) did Govt. of India withdraw Ritwik Ghatak's Padma Shri award? (copy from RTI question: In 1970, it was announced that Ritwik Ghatak would be given Padma Shri award. Soon after, a group of Opposition showed their dissatisfaction, as the year was Mahatma Gandhis birth centenary and Ritwik Ghatak reportedly criticized Gandhi-ji.). I don't know why don't the allow question mark.
  I was feeling those category selection as "complicated", so I filed under "Cabinet secretariat" and requested to "recategorize" if it was a mistake.
  If you know one more editor here who is interested in RTI, you may start a category Category:Wikipedians interested in Right to Information Act. It may be handy for few WP India editors, in general.
  As you filed that Modi-ji RTI, long ago, you are the right person to lead. --Tito☸Dutta 19:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

have you already filed the RTI? How did you file that? sarvajna (talk) 19:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't think the government has any right to disclose the adoptions made by Mahatma, also for Padma awards you could have sent the RTI to the home ministry. Note that any RTI applications which reads like a clarification/question will be rejected. Only information will be provided, you are not asking a question in the application but you are making a request for information. You can wait for 30 days and file a first appeal if there is no reply. Also if they take a lot of time they might give a proper answer. Keep me updated about the status, they are very interesting. -sarvajna (talk) 20:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

If you make that category, you can add me. I wanted to know what happened to Shrutlekhan-Rajbhasha, it was developed by C-DAC with government funding, not clear if it was in collaboration but it was later owned by IBM who discretely sold it to nuance who discretely abandoned it (I confirmed with nuance). But C-DAC is obliged to give me the status and the application! Never mind that -- I couldn't file an RTI with them online because their department was magically excluded from the online list, I confirmed it is covered under RTI though. I have hunted these OCR(tesseract is next to useless), Spell check, Speech Recognition for Hindi for quite some time and met only disappointment (the spell correction solution from IIT Madras works though). --AmritasyaPutra^T 13:50, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

RTI continued

I missed both your and AmritasyaPutra's replies above. Ooops. Other than 2 RTIs I mentioned just above. I asked a third question as well.

Question in brief: According to Government reports and data, how many RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) and Muslim League members were arrested for protesting against the British or their freedom-fight related activities

Now, the same question in details: Mr. Javed Akhtar, an admirable and famous Indian writer, in an interview given to Mr. Wajahat Khan, Dawn News, Pakistan, pointed out the following thing-- Similarity between RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) and Muslim League- Not a single RSS or Muslim League leader was arrested during Indian freedom movement for protesting against British.

Now, not a single RSS or Muslim League member was arrested for protesting against British before 1947 - is a bit strange.

For last few weeks, I have been trying to find answer of this question, but could not find any definite answer.

So, being very much fond of information, I am curios to learn: according to Government reports and data, how many RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) and Muslim League members were arrested for protesting against the British or their freedom-fight related activities.

Now

1. I have receipts (I mean sent to my house by post) only for this third RTI. Should I ask anywhere for receipt of the first two (mentioned above)?
2. Just now, the speed post I got from them mentions (this RSS Muslim League question) "The current CPIO is not the custodian of the information sought for by you".

Suggestions? --Tito☸Dutta 08:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tito sorry for the delay for the reply of the first two RTI: If 30 days have passed and if you have not got any reply then you can file a first appeal, even if they had rejected your RTI they should have sent you a reply. For the third RTI also you can file a first appeal as it is the responsibility of the PIO to transfer the request to correct authority but it depends. For example if I filed a RTI with the Home Ministry for some data regarding the population then it is their responsibility to transfer the request to Registrar General of India. RGI comes under HM but I am not sure about your case, to whom the RTI was addressed, which dept. Also the first appeal should be filed within 30 days after the reply was received. -sarvajna (talk) 12:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Please cast your vote

Please do not forget to cast your vote Shrikanthv (talk) 07:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Shrikanthv I will cast my vote but I am planning to wait for some more arguments. Thanks -sarvajna (talk) 09:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Other page

Can you see [5] again? I think I am edit warring with a sock puppeteer who keeps inserting nonsensical content and now fabricates references. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure about the sock puppet thing but the way he was quoting Gita or Quran makes no sense, I have started a discussion on the talk page. May be he can discuss it there. -sarvajna (talk) 07:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Thinkmaths (talk) 08:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is below the thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Thinkmaths reported by User:Vigyani (Result: ). Thank you.Thinkmaths (talk) 08:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Sarvajna, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Ugog Nizdast Thanks a lot and I wish you the same. -sarvajna (talk) 02:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Help

I am not able to logon to other wikis. Not able to register either. What do I do to make this id global? Thanks

See Wikipedia:Unified login and links from there. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Sarvajna. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Sarvajna~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Oriya->Odia

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Oriya_language#Requested_move_17_June_2015. Thanks. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

		Happy Diwali!!!
		Sky full of fireworks, Mouth full of sweets, Home full of lamps, And festival full of sweet memories... Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

2016 March Indian Collaboration of the Months

Hello,

We are happy to inform you that WikiProject Indian Collaborations of the month is going to be restarted this month and we want your active support here.

1. Please nominate an article or vote other nominations here. The process will continue till 10 March.
2. Should we introduce prizes for the best participants? If so, what should be the criteria, and what prizes should we give? Share your views here.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Canvassed?

I know that I am supposed to assume good faith but it is difficult to do when someone pretty much comes out of retirement to make an oppose !vote based on alleged POV in the notorious India-Pakistan, Hindu-Muslim area. Were you notified of the Vanamonde93 request for adminship by some other party off-wiki? It is all very strange. - Sitush (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Good to see you too Sitush, I was here sever days ago making an edit (if you check my edit history) so not exactly retired but inactive I can say .-sarvajna (talk) 20:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

I know. I mentioned your very minimal recent edits. It doesn't address the issue at hand. There is something odd going on regarding many of the oppose votes that concentrate on alleged POV and if you think that it hasn't been spotted, I'm telling you that you are wrong. Too many people who are basically inactive have been turning up, which usually means off-wiki collaboration or, at least, notification. - Sitush (talk) 20:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

You keep up with your accusations -sarvajna (talk) 20:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Still no answer then. Fair enough: I will draw my own conclusions. - Sitush (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Answer to what? That why did I come back? -sarvajna (talk) 20:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:00, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AdhunikaSarvajna. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Murdeshwar

Respected Sir, I saw on Wikipedia Murudeshwara page that you had earlier participated in a discussion about my hometown Murdeshwar. I request you to revisit the page and provide your expert comments about my new posting on the talk page of Murdeshwar. I am new to Wikipedia and do not know how to contact members for getting help. It is my earnest request to all experienced members of Wikipedia to help me in getting back the correct spelling of my home town. In my humble opinion, a mistake made by the first author should not be allowed to carry forward. Please take some time out of your busy schedule and help us.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Murudeshwara — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.218.204.92 (talk) 23:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AdhunikaSarvajna. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Dayavittu sahaaya maadi

Love ಜಿಹಾದ್ನ ಲೇಖನವು NPOV ಇಲ್ಲ. ಅದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಏನನ್ನಾದರೂ ಮಾಡಿ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:54A1:76A2:98FB:A08A:93A2:EB71 (talk) 11:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AdhunikaSarvajna. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AdhunikaSarvajna. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)